David H. Lees

17 papers receiving 456 citations

Peers

David H. Lees
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Biochemistry 140
  • Forestry 50
  • Food Science 167
  • Plant Science 179
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 34
Replace F.C. Madsen with:
F.C. Madsen United States
Karen Harper Australia
V. O. Taiwo Nigeria
S. Majumdar India
Shuai Huang China
John Ikechukwu Ihedioha Nigeria
Beatrice De Giulio Italy
Christian Lengsfeld Germany
Ingrid Specht Germany
Volkan Arif Yılmaz Türkiye
David H. Lees relative to F.C. Madsen United States F.C. Madsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
F.C. Madsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David H. Lees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David H. Lees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David H. Lees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David H. Lees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David H. Lees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David H. Lees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David H. Lees. The network helps show where David H. Lees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside David H. Lees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David H. Lees Line = papers co-authored together David H. Lees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1972247
2 201068
3
Utilization of protein resources
198146
4 197135
5 196931
6
Tracks & signs of the birds of Britain and Europe: An identification guide
198722
7 19748
8 19728
9 19588
10 19666
11
The impact of the 6-month waiting target for elective surgery: a patient record study.
20145
12 19823
13 19612
14 19742
15 19782
16
European Union Reference Laboratory for Monitoring Bacteriological and Viral Contamination of Bivalve Molluscs
20151
17
Risk factors in shellfish harvesting areas
20081

About David H. Lees

David H. Lees is a scholar working on Surgery, Plant Science, Urology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 495 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urological Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Infection Control and Ventilation (1 paper), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (1 paper), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (1 paper), Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research (1 paper), Ovarian function and disorders (1 paper), Dental Education, Practice, Research (1 paper) and 2D Materials and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (140 citations), Forestry (50 citations), Food Science (167 citations), Plant Science (179 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (34 citations). David H. Lees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include F. J. Francis, David Stanley, Wilfrid van Pelt, Marion Koopmans, Linda Verhoef, Harry Vennema, Hendriek C. Boshuizen, Kathleen Henshilwood, J. R. Sutherst and Mark Lawrence. Their work appears in journals such as BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, International Journal of Clinical Practice, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Journal of Food Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact