David Fitzpatrick
Impact in
- Anthropology top 10%
- Philippine History and Culture
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- History top 5%
- Scottish History and National Identity
- Historical Studies of British Isles
Papers in
-
- Irish and British Studies 27
-
- Classical Antiquity Studies 3
- Co-authors
- B. L. ClarkAlan H. SommersteinSophoclesKerby A. MillerDaniel C. PeckS. E. PaloSimone D’Amico
- Journals
- Irish Historical Studies (8 papers)Irish Economic and Social History (5 papers)The English Historical Review (3 papers)The Historical Journal (2 papers)Australian Veterinary Journal (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- IrelandAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
David Fitzpatrick
32 papers receiving 163 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Anthropology 43
- History 37
- Sociology and Political Science 152
- Political Science and International Relations 41
- Geography, Planning and Development 7
Countries citing papers authored by David Fitzpatrick
This map shows the geographic impact of David Fitzpatrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Fitzpatrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Fitzpatrick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Fitzpatrick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Fitzpatrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Fitzpatrick. The network helps show where David Fitzpatrick may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside David Fitzpatrick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ernest Blythe in Ulster: The Making of a Double Agent? | 2018 | 0 |
| 2 | 2012 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 0 | |
| 4 | Sophocles : selected fragmentary plays | 2006 | 5 |
| 5 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 7 | Harry Boland's Irish revolution | 2003 | 12 |
| 8 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 0 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1987 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1987 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1986 | 14 | |
| 16 | 1985 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1981 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1980 | 26 | |
| 19 | 1972 | 18 | |
| 20 | 1961 | 5 |
About David Fitzpatrick
David Fitzpatrick is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, History, Microbiology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 43 papers that have together received 226 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Irish and British Studies (27 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (4 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (3 papers), World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact (2 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers), Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology (1 paper), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (1 paper) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (43 citations), History (37 citations), Sociology and Political Science (152 citations), Political Science and International Relations (41 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (7 citations). David Fitzpatrick has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include B. L. Clark, Alan H. Sommerstein, Sophocles, Kerby A. Miller, Daniel C. Peck, S. E. Palo and Simone D’Amico. Their work appears in journals such as Irish Historical Studies, Irish Economic and Social History, The English Historical Review, The Historical Journal and Australian Veterinary Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.