Countries where authors publish in Irish Historical Studies
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Irish Historical Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Irish Historical Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Irish Historical Studies more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Irish Historical Studies
This network shows the impact of papers published in Irish Historical Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Irish Historical Studies.
About Irish Historical Studies
The 652 papers published in Irish Historical Studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Irish Historical Studies usually cover History (279 papers), Classics (43 papers), Sociology and Political Science (480 papers), Anthropology (36 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (61 papers) specifically the topics of Irish and British Studies (458 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (226 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (144 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (46 papers), Medieval Literature and History (42 papers), Philippine History and Culture (31 papers), World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact (18 papers) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (14 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Irish Historical Studies are T. W. Moody, Brendan Bradshaw, Mary E. Daly, Steven G. Ellis, Jim Kelly, David Fitzpatrick, Mark Finnane, James S. Donnelly, David Fitzpatrick and Keith Lindley.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.