David F. Crew
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- History top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Gender Studies
- Co-authors
- Klaus TenfeldeStephen G. FritzGeorge O. KentW. SchröderJanice MonkRichard HowittDirk Schubert
- Topics
- European history and politics (18 papers)German History and Society (5 papers)Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David F. Crew
22 papers receiving 118 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Political Science and International Relations 87
- Sociology and Political Science 84
- History 61
- Economics and Econometrics 18
- Gender Studies 10
Countries citing papers authored by David F. Crew
This map shows the geographic impact of David F. Crew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David F. Crew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David F. Crew more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David F. Crew
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David F. Crew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David F. Crew. The network helps show where David F. Crew may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David F. Crew
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David F. Crew. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David F. Crew based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David F. Crew. David F. Crew is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bodies and Ruins: Imagining the Bombing of Germany, 1945 to the Present | 1 |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Looking forward - looking back: changing social and economic conditions of Aboriginal people in rural NSW, 1965-2015 | 1 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | Town in the Ruhr: A Social History of Bochum, 1860-1914 | 5 |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 31 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About David F. Crew
David F. Crew is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 26 papers that have together received 163 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European history and politics (18 papers), German History and Society (5 papers) and Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (61 citations), Political Science and International Relations (87 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (84 citations). David F. Crew has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Klaus Tenfelde, Stephen G. Fritz, George O. Kent, W. Schröder, Janice Monk, Richard Howitt and Dirk Schubert. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Technology and Culture and Labour / Le Travail.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.