David Deacon
- Communication top 1%
- Media Studies and Communication 16
- Social Media and Politics 11
- Public Relations and Crisis Communication 3
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Public Administration top 10%
-
- Media Influence and Politics 3
- Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering 3
- Migration, Refugees, and Integration 3
- Philosophy top 5%
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 5
- Political and Economic history of UK and US 5
David Deacon
45 papers receiving 738 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Communication 440
- Gender Studies 121
- Public Administration 36
- Sociology and Political Science 394
- Philosophy 89
Countries citing papers authored by David Deacon
This map shows the geographic impact of David Deacon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Deacon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Deacon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Deacon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Deacon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Deacon. The network helps show where David Deacon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 16 scholars most cited alongside David Deacon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 6 | UK news coverage of the 2016 EU Referendum. Report 4 (6 May ??? 15 June 2016 ) | 2016 | 2 |
| 7 | National press coverage of UK general elections (1918-2010): end of project report for the Leverhulme Trust | 2014 | 2 |
| 8 | Rural areas in the UK impartiality review: a content analysis for the BBC Trust | 2014 | 1 |
| 9 | 2014 | 147 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 11 | The BBC’s reporting of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict | 2006 | 7 |
| 12 | Reporting the 2005 U.K. General Election | 2005 | 2 |
| 13 | 2001 | 23 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 33 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 15 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 13 | |
| 19 | Taxation and representation : the media, political communication and the poll tax | 1994 | 47 |
| 20 | 1991 | 5 |
About David Deacon
David Deacon is a scholar working on Communication, General Social Sciences, Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations and History, having authored 49 papers that have together received 901 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Studies and Communication (16 papers), Social Media and Politics (11 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (5 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (5 papers), Media Influence and Politics (3 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (3 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (3 papers) and Public Relations and Crisis Communication (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (440 citations), Gender Studies (121 citations), Public Administration (36 citations), Sociology and Political Science (394 citations) and Philosophy (89 citations). David Deacon has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include James Stanyer, Natalie Fenton, Alan Bryman, Peter Golding, Dominic Wring, Wendy A. Monk, Peter Birmingham, Vincent Mosco, John Downey and Emily Harmer. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Communication, Media Culture & Society, Journal of Navigation, Journalism Studies and British Politics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.