Daryl Weir
Impact in
- Human-Computer Interaction top 2%
- Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Usability and User Interface Design
- Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Papers in
-
- Interactive and Immersive Displays 6
-
- Architecture and Computational Design 1
- Co-authors
- Antti OulasvirtaSimon RogersAnna Maria FeitKashyap TodiRoderick Murray‐SmithMarkus LöchtefeldHenning PohlPer Ola Kristensson
- Journals
- Communications of the ACM (1 paper)Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (2 papers)Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (1 paper)ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- FinlandUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Daryl Weir
11 papers receiving 309 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Human-Computer Interaction 228
- Cognitive Neuroscience 132
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 87
- Information Systems and Management 19
- Occupational Therapy 11
Countries citing papers authored by Daryl Weir
This map shows the geographic impact of Daryl Weir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daryl Weir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daryl Weir more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daryl Weir
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daryl Weir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daryl Weir. The network helps show where Daryl Weir may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Daryl Weir, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 62 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 76 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 66 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 55 | |
| 11 | Driver Metrics, an Overview of User Needs and Uses | 2010 | 3 |
About Daryl Weir
Daryl Weir is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Architecture, Cognitive Neuroscience, Occupational Therapy and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 11 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interactive and Immersive Displays (6 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (4 papers), Design Education and Practice (2 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (2 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (2 papers), Green IT and Sustainability (2 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (1 paper) and Architecture and Computational Design (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (228 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (132 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (87 citations), Information Systems and Management (19 citations) and Occupational Therapy (11 citations). Daryl Weir has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Antti Oulasvirta, Simon Rogers, Anna Maria Feit, Kashyap Todi, Roderick Murray‐Smith, Markus Löchtefeld, Henning Pohl, Per Ola Kristensson, Keith Vertanen and Ville Kyrki. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, Aaltodoc (Aalto University), Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) and ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.