Minnesota Review

446 papers and 941 indexed citations

About

The 446 papers published in Minnesota Review in the last decades have received a total of 941 indexed citations. Papers published in Minnesota Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (64 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (62 papers) and Cultural Studies (37 papers) specifically the topics of Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (16 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (13 papers) and Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (12 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Minnesota Review are Barbara Herrnstein Smith, Derek Woods, Andrew Cole, Sherry Lee Linkon, John Russo, Jeffrey J. Williams, Janell Watson, David Roediger, Jean Franco and Rita Felski.

In The Last Decade

Minnesota Review

122 papers receiving 398 citations

Peers

Minnesota Review
Comparison fields: 5 of 182
  • Sociology and Political Science 278
  • Literature and Literary Theory 224
  • Cultural Studies 121
  • Philosophy 97
  • Geography, Planning and Development 89
Replace Journal of Folklore Research with:
Journal of Folklore Research United States
Contemporary Women s Writing United Kingdom
Folklore Electronic Journal of Folklore Estonia
Genre United States
Studies in American Indian Literatures United States
Journal of Religion and Popular Culture United States
English Language Notes United States
LIT Literature Interpretation Theory United States
Critical Survey United Kingdom
Revista de Dialectología y Tradiciones Populares Spain
Journal of Folklore Research United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Minnesota Review
Minnesota Review · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Minnesota Review
Minnesota Review · 1×

Countries where authors publish in Minnesota Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Minnesota Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Minnesota Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Minnesota Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Minnesota Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Minnesota Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Minnesota Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026