Daphne Philbert

852 citations
24 papers · 608 indexed · h-index 14

Daphne Philbert

23 papers receiving 597 citations

Peers

Daphne Philbert
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Family Practice 172
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 227
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 21
  • General Health Professions 220
  • Speech and Hearing 44
Replace Laura Odell with:
Laura Odell United States
Tami L. Remington United States
Kem P. Krueger United States
Sandra Benavides United States
Yen‐Ming Huang Taiwan
Polly Duncan United Kingdom
Matthew M. Murawski United States
Annie Blyth United Kingdom
Åsa Kettis-Lindblad Sweden
Reamer L. Bushardt United States
Daphne Philbert relative to Laura Odell United States Laura Odell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Laura Odell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daphne Philbert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daphne Philbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daphne Philbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daphne Philbert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daphne Philbert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daphne Philbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daphne Philbert. The network helps show where Daphne Philbert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Daphne Philbert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daphne Philbert Line = papers co-authored together Daphne Philbert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20241
3 20241
4 202111
5 202089
6 201915
7 201830
8 201816
9 201724
10 20167
11 201630
12 20169
13 201557
14 201537
15 201532
16 201456
17 201458
18 201410
19 20135
20 201161

About Daphne Philbert

Daphne Philbert is a scholar working on Family Practice, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 24 papers that have together received 608 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (13 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (10 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (7 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (6 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (3 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (3 papers) and Antibiotic Use and Resistance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (172 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (227 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (21 citations), General Health Professions (220 citations) and Speech and Hearing (44 citations). Daphne Philbert has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Marcel L. Bouvy, Ellen S. Koster, Liset van Dijk, Lyda Blom, Erica C.G. van Geffen, Tjalling W. de Vries, M.B. Bos, Marcia Vervloet, Jany Rademakers and Peter A. G. M. De Smet. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Journal of Asthma and Journal of Adolescent Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026