Mette Heringa

35 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers

Mette Heringa
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 106
  • Family Practice 19
  • Health Information Management 30
  • Toxicology 9
  • Pharmacology 22
Replace Peter Tenni with:
Peter Tenni Australia
Christina Raae Hansen Ireland
Lolkje T. W. de Jong-van den Berg Netherlands
Kimberly Braxton Lloyd United States
Just Ebbesen Norway
Helge Svaar Norway
Shiew-Mei Huang United States
Hsiang‐Wen Lin Taiwan
Mercedes Aza‐Pascual‐Salcedo Spain
Marco Egbring Switzerland
Mette Heringa relative to Peter Tenni Australia Peter Tenni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Peter Tenni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mette Heringa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mette Heringa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mette Heringa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mette Heringa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mette Heringa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mette Heringa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mette Heringa. The network helps show where Mette Heringa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mette Heringa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mette Heringa Line = papers co-authored together Mette Heringa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200372
2 202240
3 202034
4 202132
5 201924
6 200521
7 201521
8 202217
9 201316
10 201614
11 201714
12 201714
13 201713
14 20229
15 20218
16 20238
17 20237
18 20215
19
[Tertiary obstetric care: the aims of the planning decree on perinatal care of 2001 have not yet been achieved].
20085
20 20154

About Mette Heringa

Mette Heringa is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Health Information Management, Pharmacology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 38 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (13 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (4 papers), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (3 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (2 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (1 paper), Healthcare Quality and Management (1 paper) and Synthesis of β-Lactam Compounds (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (106 citations), Family Practice (19 citations), Health Information Management (30 citations), Toxicology (9 citations) and Pharmacology (22 citations). Mette Heringa has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Marcel L. Bouvy, Annemieke Floor‐Schreudering, Peter A. G. M. De Smet, Katja Taxis, Petra Denig, Jacqueline G. Hugtenburg, Gert Baas, Franz Maximilian Rasche, Frieder Keller and Paul A.F. Jansen. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Drugs & Aging, Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology and Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact