Daouda Ngom

48 papers receiving 242 citations

Peers

Daouda Ngom
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Forestry 126
  • Horticulture 14
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 102
  • Plant Science 131
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 24
Replace Tene Kwetche Sop with:
Tene Kwetche Sop Germany
Souleymane Ganaba Burkina Faso
B Sinsin Benin
Catherine Ky‐Dembele Kenya
Jean T. Claude Codjia Benin
Moussa Diabaté Guinea
Leonardo Rodríguez Suárez Colombia
Helton Nonato de Souza Brazil
Jarret Mhango Malawi
Gérard Zombre Burkina Faso
Daouda Ngom relative to Tene Kwetche Sop Germany Tene Kwetche Sop's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Tene Kwetche Sop · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daouda Ngom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daouda Ngom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daouda Ngom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daouda Ngom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daouda Ngom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daouda Ngom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daouda Ngom. The network helps show where Daouda Ngom may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daouda Ngom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daouda Ngom Line = papers co-authored together Daouda Ngom links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202056
2 201323
3 201822
4 202013
5 201410
6 20179
7 20158
8 20148
9 20137
10 20187
11 20176
12 20136
13
Firewood potential production of three sahelian woody species (Grewia bicolor, Pterocarpus lucens and Combretum glutinosum) in Ferlo (northern Senegal).
20125
14 20225
15 20225
16 20125
17 20165
18 20234
19 20204
20 20154

About Daouda Ngom

Daouda Ngom is a scholar working on Forestry, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Ecology and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 64 papers that have together received 264 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African Botany and Ecology Studies (42 papers), Agriculture and Rural Development Research (40 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (8 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (5 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (5 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (4 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (4 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Forestry (126 citations), Horticulture (14 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (102 citations), Plant Science (131 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (24 citations). Daouda Ngom has collaborated with scholars based in Senegal, France and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Nathalie Diagne, Sergio Svistoonoff, Pape Ibrahima Djighaly, Hafsa Cherif‐Silini, Valérie Hocher, Diégane Diouf, Laurent Laplaze, Dioumacor Fall, Caroline Vincke and Mariama Ngom. Their work appears in journals such as Agroforestry Systems, Biogeosciences, Annals of Forest Science, Plant and Soil and Journal of Forest Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact