Danielle Wilde

1.5k citations
69 papers · 1.1k indexed · h-index 18

Danielle Wilde

68 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Danielle Wilde
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Human-Computer Interaction 766
  • Museology 72
  • Computer Science Applications 59
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 67
  • Sensory Systems 39
Replace Pedro Sanches with:
Pedro Sanches Sweden
Noura Howell United States
Stephan Wensveen Netherlands
Vasiliki Tsaknaki Sweden
Anna Ståhl Sweden
Lian Loke Australia
Ferran Altarriba Bertran United States
Paul Tennent United Kingdom
Laura Devendorf United States
Brendan Walker United Kingdom
Danielle Wilde relative to Pedro Sanches Sweden Pedro Sanches's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Pedro Sanches · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Wilde

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Wilde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Wilde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Wilde more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Wilde

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Wilde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Wilde. The network helps show where Danielle Wilde may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Wilde, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Wilde Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Wilde links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202411
2 20241
3 20241
4 20231
5 20235
6 20230
7 202117
8 202036
9 20199
10 20194
11 201930
12 201820
13 201823
14 201412
15 20131
16 201137
17
Swing That Thing...moving to move: Extending our poetic and expressive potential
20102
18
Physiological tracking, wearable interactive systems and human performance
20107
19
A new performativity: wearables and body-devices
20091
20 200911

About Danielle Wilde

Danielle Wilde is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Museology, Geography, Planning and Development, Architecture and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (49 papers), Crafts, Textile, and Design (11 papers), Design Education and Practice (10 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (9 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (5 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (4 papers), Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (4 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (766 citations), Museology (72 citations), Computer Science Applications (59 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (67 citations) and Sensory Systems (39 citations). Danielle Wilde has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Oscar Tomico, Ferran Altarriba Bertran, Anna Vallgårda, Katherine Isbister, Florian Mueller, Kristina Andersen, Hilary Davis, Thecla Schiphorst, Patrizia Marti and Sietske Klooster. Their work appears in journals such as interactions, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Informatics, Futures and Human-Computer Interaction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026