Daniela Vallejo

18 papers receiving 479 citations

Peers

Daniela Vallejo
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Biophysics 44
  • Biological Psychiatry 19
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 48
  • Hepatology 46
  • Cell Biology 70
Replace Santos Blanco with:
Santos Blanco Spain
Katsura Nozawa Japan
Giuseppina Mariucci Italy
Danielle Duma Brazil
Antonio J. López-Gambero Spain
Jiyue Wen China
Camille C. Caldeira da Silva Brazil
In-Young Choi South Korea
Julien Mozo France
Zhenzhen Qu China
Daniela Vallejo relative to Santos Blanco Spain Santos Blanco's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Santos Blanco · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Vallejo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Vallejo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Vallejo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Vallejo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Vallejo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Vallejo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Vallejo. The network helps show where Daniela Vallejo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Vallejo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Vallejo Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Vallejo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2012142
2 201362
3 201657
4 201753
5 201448
6 201423
7 201423
8 201321
9 199514
10 199413
11 20219
12 19966
13 20125
14 20015
15 20153
16 20033
17 20192
18
An analysis of postnatal growth in OF1 mice within an interval of 1-220 days of age.
20052

About Daniela Vallejo

Daniela Vallejo is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology, Biophysics, Epidemiology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 18 papers that have together received 491 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spaceflight effects on biology (5 papers), Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects (5 papers), Energy and Environment Impacts (3 papers), Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (2 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (44 citations), Biological Psychiatry (19 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (48 citations), Hepatology (46 citations) and Cell Biology (70 citations). Daniela Vallejo has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Chile and United States. Frequent co-authors include María J. Tuñón, Nibaldo C. Inestrosa, Javier González‐Gallego, Beatriz San‐Miguel, Norma Possa Marroni, Juliana Tieppo, Juan F. Codocedo, Irene Crespo, M. Álvarez and Jesús Prìeto. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pineal Research, Neural Plasticity, The International Journal of Developmental Biology, Veterinary Research and Journal of Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact