Daniela Rodrígues-Amorím
- Biological Psychiatry top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Carlos SpuchJ.M. OlivaresTania Rivera‐BaltanásRoberto Carlos Agís‐BalboaMarta LópezHéctor J. CarunchoÁfrica González‐FernándezElena de las Heras
- Topics
- Tryptophan and brain disorders (6 papers)Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers)Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited StatesChile
In The Last Decade
Daniela Rodrígues-Amorím
18 papers receiving 429 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Biological Psychiatry 165
- Molecular Biology 116
- Psychiatry and Mental health 85
- Cognitive Neuroscience 82
- Physiology 67
Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Rodrígues-Amorím
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Rodrígues-Amorím's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Rodrígues-Amorím with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Rodrígues-Amorím more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Rodrígues-Amorím
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Rodrígues-Amorím. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Rodrígues-Amorím. The network helps show where Daniela Rodrígues-Amorím may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniela Rodrígues-Amorím
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniela Rodrígues-Amorím. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniela Rodrígues-Amorím based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniela Rodrígues-Amorím. Daniela Rodrígues-Amorím is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 43 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 40 | |
| 13 | 46 | |
| 14 | 41 | |
| 15 | 85 | |
| 16 | 46 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 4 |
About Daniela Rodrígues-Amorím
Daniela Rodrígues-Amorím is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Behavioral Neuroscience and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 18 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tryptophan and brain disorders (6 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (165 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (43 citations) and Neurology (51 citations). Daniela Rodrígues-Amorím has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Carlos Spuch, J.M. Olivares, Tania Rivera‐Baltanás, Roberto Carlos Agís‐Balboa, Marta López, Héctor J. Caruncho, África González‐Fernández, Elena de las Heras, Alejandro García-Caballero and Raúl Méndez. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Scientific Reports and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.