Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Understanding Politeness
2013360 citationsDániel Z. Kádár, Michael Haughprofile →
The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness
2017164 citationsMichael Haugh, Dániel Z. Kádár et al.profile →
Citations per year, relative to Dániel Z. Kádár Dániel Z. Kádár (= 1×)
peers
Anna Wierzbicka
Countries citing papers authored by Dániel Z. Kádár
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Dániel Z. Kádár's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dániel Z. Kádár with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dániel Z. Kádár more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dániel Z. Kádár. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dániel Z. Kádár. The network helps show where Dániel Z. Kádár may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dániel Z. Kádár
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dániel Z. Kádár.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dániel Z. Kádár based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dániel Z. Kádár. Dániel Z. Kádár is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House. (2020). The pragmatics of ritual. Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA). 30(1). 1–14.13 indexed citations
11.
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House. (2019). Ritual frames. Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA). 30(1). 142–168.41 indexed citations
12.
Bull, Peter, Anita Fetzer, & Dániel Z. Kádár. (2019). Calling Mr Speaker ‘Mr Speaker’. Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA). 30(1). 64–87.13 indexed citations
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Michael Haugh. (2017). The Metapragmatics of politeness. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield).1 indexed citations
15.
Kádár, Dániel Z., et al.. (2016). Nyelvi udvariasság/udvariatlanság és metapragmatika. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland).
16.
Kádár, Dániel Z., et al.. (2015). Ritual in intercultural contact: a case study of heckling. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield).1 indexed citations
17.
Kádár, Dániel Z.. (2012). The two faces of the dragon : linguistic politeness - and its lack - in Chinese. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield).2 indexed citations
18.
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Yuling Pan. (2012). Face and politeness in Chinese: An introduction. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield).1 indexed citations
19.
Kádár, Dániel Z.. (2011). A graphic-semiotic analysis of the Chinese multimodal elevation and denigration phenomenon. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield).7 indexed citations
20.
Kádár, Dániel Z.. (2005). The Powerful and the Powerless - on the classification of the Chinese polite denigrating/elevating addressing terminology. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.