Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Understanding Politeness
2013360 citationsDániel Z. Kádár, Michael Haughprofile →
The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness
2017164 citationsJonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Haugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Haugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Haugh more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Haugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Haugh. The network helps show where Michael Haugh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Haugh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Haugh.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Haugh based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Haugh. Michael Haugh is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Michael Haugh. (2017). The Metapragmatics of politeness. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield).1 indexed citations
8.
Kádár, Dániel Z., et al.. (2016). Nyelvi udvariasság/udvariatlanság és metapragmatika. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland).
9.
Haugh, Michael, Wei-Lin Melody Chang, & Dániel Z. Kádár. (2015). “Doing deference”. Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA). 73–98.18 indexed citations
10.
Haugh, Michael. (2015). International students and the "English problem" in Australian universities: a discursive perspective. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 91–104.2 indexed citations
Cassidy, Steve, et al.. (2012). The Australian National Corpus: National Infrastructure for Language Resources. Language Resources and Evaluation. 3295–3299.2 indexed citations
Haugh, Michael. (2006). Discourse politeness in Japanese Conversation (Book review). Journal of Politeness Research. 2(2). 313–317.1 indexed citations
19.
Haugh, Michael. (2005). "Requests and Culture: Politeness in British English and Japanese" by Saeko Fukushima. Journal of Politeness Research. 1(1). 160–165.1 indexed citations
20.
Haugh, Michael. (2003). JAPANESE AND NON-JAPANESE PERCEPTIONS OF JAPANESE COMMUNICATION. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 5(1). 156–177.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.