Daniel Woolf
- Classics top 2%
- Medieval Literature and History 3
- History top 0.5%
- Scottish History and National Identity 5
- Historical Studies of British Isles 3
- Anthropology top 5%
- Philippine History and Culture 8
- Museology top 5%
- Historical Art and Culture Studies 4
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 4
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 6
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 5
- Co-authors
- Chris Given-WilsonPatricia CrawfordSara MendelsonJohn MorrillPaul SlackNorman L. JonesG. E. AylmerThomas Mayer
- Cited by
- ClassicsHistoryAnthropology
- Journals
- Sixteenth Century Journal (5 papers)The American Historical Review (3 papers)American Journal of Legal History (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Daniel Woolf
42 papers receiving 259 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Classics 81
- History 227
- Anthropology 88
- Museology 31
- Literature and Literary Theory 93
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Woolf
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Woolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Woolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Woolf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Woolf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Woolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Woolf. The network helps show where Daniel Woolf may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Woolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 4 | Uma história global da história | 2014 | 0 |
| 5 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 9 | Jane Austen and History Revisited: The Past, Gender, and Memory from the Restoration to Persuasion (1) | 2004 | 3 |
| 10 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1993 | 10 | |
| 15 | Of Danes and Giants: Popular Beliefs about the Past in Early Modern England | 1991 | 5 |
| 16 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1988 | 11 | |
| 18 | 1986 | 8 | |
| 19 | 1968 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1954 | 0 |
About Daniel Woolf
Daniel Woolf is a scholar working on History, Museology, Classics, Anthropology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 50 papers that have together received 477 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philippine History and Culture (8 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (6 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (5 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (5 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (4 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (4 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (3 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (81 citations), History (227 citations), Anthropology (88 citations), Museology (31 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (93 citations). Daniel Woolf has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Chris Given-Wilson, Patricia Crawford, Sara Mendelson, John Morrill, Paul Slack, Norman L. Jones, G. E. Aylmer, Thomas Mayer, Masayuki Satō and Antonio Franceschetti. Their work appears in journals such as Sixteenth Century Journal, The American Historical Review, American Journal of Legal History, Journal of History and The English Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.