Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Wolfenzon
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Wolfenzon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Wolfenzon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Wolfenzon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Wolfenzon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Wolfenzon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Wolfenzon. The network helps show where Daniel Wolfenzon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Wolfenzon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Wolfenzon.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Wolfenzon based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Wolfenzon. Daniel Wolfenzon is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bennedsen, Morten, Elena Simintzi, Margarita Tsoutsoura, & Daniel Wolfenzon. (2022). Do Firms Respond to Gender Pay Gap Transparency?. The Journal of Finance. 77(4). 2051–2091.77 indexed citations
Schnabl, Philipp, Daniel Paravisini, Veronica Rappoport, & Daniel Wolfenzon. (2011). Dissecting the Effect of Credit Supply on Trade. The Faculty Digital Archive (New York University).1 indexed citations
8.
Nagar, Venky, Kathy R. Petroni, & Daniel Wolfenzon. (2011). Governance Problems in Closely Held Corporations. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 46(4). 943–966.4 indexed citations
9.
Bennedsen, Morten, Francisco Pérez‐González, & Daniel Wolfenzon. (2010). Very preliminary and incomplete Please do not cite or circulate Comments welcome "Do CEOs matter?" *.4 indexed citations
10.
Nagar, Venky, Kathy R. Petroni, & Daniel Wolfenzon. (2008). Governance Problems in Close Corporations. The Faculty Digital Archive (New York University).19 indexed citations
Bennedsen, Morten, Francisco Pérez‐González, & Daniel Wolfenzon. (2006). Do Ceos Matter. SSRN Electronic Journal.76 indexed citations
14.
Bennedsen, Morten, Kasper Meisner Nielsen, & Daniel Wolfenzon. (2005). The Family Behind the Family Firm: Evidence from Successions in Danish Firms. The Faculty Digital Archive (New York University).6 indexed citations
Almeida, Heitor & Daniel Wolfenzon. (2004). The Effect of External Finance on the Equilibrium Allocation of Capital. SSRN Electronic Journal.6 indexed citations
Almeida, Heitor & Daniel Wolfenzon. (2002). The Effect of External Finance and Internal Capital Markets on the Equilibrium Allocation of Capital. The Faculty Digital Archive (New York University).3 indexed citations
20.
Nagar, Venky, Kathy R. Petroni, & Daniel Wolfenzon. (2002). OWNERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE IN CLOSE CORPORATIONS: A NATURAL EXPERIMENT IN EXOGENOUS OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE. The Faculty Digital Archive (New York University).9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.