Daniel W. Piepers

935 total citations · 1 hit paper
5 papers, 790 citations indexed

About

Daniel W. Piepers is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel W. Piepers has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 790 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Daniel W. Piepers's work include Face Recognition and Perception (3 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (2 papers) and Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (1 paper). Daniel W. Piepers is often cited by papers focused on Face Recognition and Perception (3 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (2 papers) and Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (1 paper). Daniel W. Piepers collaborates with scholars based in Australia and United States. Daniel W. Piepers's co-authors include Rachel A. Robbins, Darren Burke, Simone Favelle, Catherine Stevens, Seeta Durvasula, Roger J. Stancliffe, Michele Wiese, David Kirsh and Nathan J. Wilson and has published in prestigious journals such as Vision Research, Frontiers in Psychology and Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Daniel W. Piepers

4 papers receiving 776 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

A Review and Clarification of the Terms “holistic,” “configural,” and “relational” in the Face Perception Literature

2012 772 citations Daniel W. Piepers, Rachel A. Robbins Frontiers in Psychology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel W. Piepers Australia	3	518	261	136	135	81	5	790
Gillian Slessor United Kingdom	16	434 0.8×	233 0.9×	220 1.6×	77 0.6×	57 0.7×	29	675
Adam Flitton United Kingdom	3	593 1.1×	409 1.6×	146 1.1×	286 2.1×	34 0.4×	4	1.1k
Jo Evershed United Kingdom	4	700 1.4×	479 1.8×	169 1.2×	327 2.4×	39 0.5×	4	1.2k
Jessica Irons Australia	16	672 1.3×	315 1.2×	140 1.0×	52 0.4×	157 1.9×	43	896
Jan de Fockert United Kingdom	13	893 1.7×	482 1.8×	288 2.1×	65 0.5×	52 0.6×	16	1.3k
Lee de‐Wit Belgium	18	1.1k 2.1×	246 0.9×	189 1.4×	300 2.2×	44 0.5×	53	1.3k
Nicole L. Nelson Australia	16	448 0.9×	390 1.5×	308 2.3×	157 1.2×	27 0.3×	40	773
Arlette Pineau France	19	656 1.3×	259 1.0×	104 0.8×	436 3.2×	19 0.2×	39	1.1k
Helen Steingroever Netherlands	12	390 0.8×	234 0.9×	98 0.7×	102 0.8×	12 0.1×	19	895
Milena Dzhelyova Belgium	19	683 1.3×	409 1.6×	126 0.9×	57 0.4×	53 0.7×	36	870

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel W. Piepers

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel W. Piepers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel W. Piepers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel W. Piepers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel W. Piepers

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel W. Piepers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel W. Piepers. The network helps show where Daniel W. Piepers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel W. Piepers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel W. Piepers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel W. Piepers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel W. Piepers. Daniel W. Piepers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

5 of 5 papers shown

1.

Wiese, Michele, Roger J. Stancliffe, Seeta Durvasula, Daniel W. Piepers, & Nathan J. Wilson. (2023). Analysis of an Australian death database of people with intellectual disability living out of the family home: Place of death and associated variables. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities. 28(3). 824–838. 1 indexed citations

2.

Piepers, Daniel W., Catherine Stevens, Darren Burke, & Rachel A. Robbins. (2021). Amplified inversion effects for moving biological stimuli remain largest for faces and bodies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 74(12). 2046–2056. 3 indexed citations

3.

Kirsh, David, Catherine Stevens, & Daniel W. Piepers. (2020). Time Course of Creativity in Dance. Frontiers in Psychology. 11. 518248–518248.

4.

Favelle, Simone, et al.. (2015). Dynamic composite faces are processed holistically. Vision Research. 112. 26–32. 14 indexed citations

5.

Piepers, Daniel W. & Rachel A. Robbins. (2012). A Review and Clarification of the Terms “holistic,” “configural,” and “relational” in the Face Perception Literature. Frontiers in Psychology. 3. 559–559. 772 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact