Ciara M. Greene

2.0k total citations
64 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Ciara M. Greene is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ciara M. Greene has authored 64 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 22 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 15 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ciara M. Greene's work include Misinformation and Its Impacts (19 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (19 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (14 papers). Ciara M. Greene is often cited by papers focused on Misinformation and Its Impacts (19 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (19 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (14 papers). Ciara M. Greene collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and United States. Ciara M. Greene's co-authors include Gillian Murphy, John A. Groeger, David Soto, Mark A. Bellgrove, Michael Gill, Linda J. Levine, Rebecca Hofstein Grady, Elizabeth F. Loftus, Ian H. Robertson and Constance de Saint Laurent and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Ciara M. Greene

58 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ciara M. Greene Ireland 21 634 349 248 201 112 64 1.2k
Jari Kätsyri Finland 19 695 1.1× 165 0.5× 463 1.9× 384 1.9× 101 0.9× 32 1.2k
Tim Draws Netherlands 10 471 0.7× 150 0.4× 169 0.7× 208 1.0× 118 1.1× 19 1.1k
Xuemin Zhang China 16 496 0.8× 292 0.8× 311 1.3× 210 1.0× 32 0.3× 78 1.1k
Carolyn Parkinson United States 23 818 1.3× 198 0.6× 549 2.2× 441 2.2× 118 1.1× 43 1.4k
Kimberley A. Wade United Kingdom 20 1.1k 1.7× 335 1.0× 620 2.5× 166 0.8× 317 2.8× 61 1.6k
Ayanna K. Thomas United States 20 899 1.4× 213 0.6× 396 1.6× 264 1.3× 327 2.9× 74 1.3k
Andreja Bubić Croatia 16 625 1.0× 118 0.3× 249 1.0× 349 1.7× 186 1.7× 60 1.2k
Stéphane Doyen Australia 12 354 0.6× 176 0.5× 202 0.8× 173 0.9× 61 0.5× 31 860
Sharda Umanath United States 14 589 0.9× 150 0.4× 111 0.4× 229 1.1× 340 3.0× 42 918
Dan Bang United Kingdom 17 772 1.2× 182 0.5× 355 1.4× 247 1.2× 265 2.4× 30 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Ciara M. Greene

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ciara M. Greene's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ciara M. Greene with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ciara M. Greene more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ciara M. Greene

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ciara M. Greene. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ciara M. Greene. The network helps show where Ciara M. Greene may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ciara M. Greene

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ciara M. Greene. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ciara M. Greene based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ciara M. Greene. Ciara M. Greene is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Murphy, Gillian & Ciara M. Greene. (2025). Who Got Lost in the Mall? Challenges in Counting and Classifying False Memories. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 39(2). 1 indexed citations
2.
Greene, Ciara M., et al.. (2025). Food-related fake news, misleading information, established misconceptions, and food choice. Current Opinion in Food Science. 63. 101309–101309. 1 indexed citations
3.
Otgaar, Henry, et al.. (2024). Fake memories: A meta-analysis on the effect of fake news on the creation of false memories and false beliefs. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 1 indexed citations
5.
Murphy, Gillian, et al.. (2023). How do participants feel about the ethics of rich false memory studies?. Memory. 31(4). 474–481. 10 indexed citations
6.
Greene, Ciara M. & Gillian Murphy. (2023). Debriefing works: Successful retraction of misinformation following a fake news study. PLoS ONE. 18(1). e0280295–e0280295. 11 indexed citations
7.
Murphy, Gillian, Elizabeth F. Loftus, Linda J. Levine, Rebecca Hofstein Grady, & Ciara M. Greene. (2023). Weak correlations among 13 episodic memory tasks related to the same public event. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 37(5). 1045–1058. 5 indexed citations
8.
Murphy, Gillian, et al.. (2023). Lost in the mall again: a preregistered replication and extension of Loftus & Pickrell (1995). Memory. 31(6). 818–830. 17 indexed citations
9.
Greene, Ciara M., Linda J. Levine, Elizabeth F. Loftus, & Gillian Murphy. (2023). Just as I expected? Hindsight bias for the outcome of a national referendum is moderated by outcome valence and surprise. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 37(5). 1016–1026.
10.
Greene, Ciara M., et al.. (2022). Best Practices for Ethical Conduct of Misinformation Research. European Psychologist. 28(3). 139–150. 22 indexed citations
11.
Greene, Ciara M., et al.. (2022). False memories for true and false vaccination information form in line with pre‐existing vaccine opinions. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 36(6). 1200–1208. 13 indexed citations
12.
Greene, Ciara M., et al.. (2022). Best Practices for Ethical Conduct of Misinformation Research: A Scoping Review and Critical Commentary. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA). 7 indexed citations
13.
Greene, Ciara M., et al.. (2022). Investigating false memories among “winners” and “losers” in the prisoner’s dilemma. Memory. 30(10). 1334–1348. 1 indexed citations
14.
Friehs, Maximilian A., Ciara M. Greene, & Bernhard Pastötter. (2021). Transcranial direct current stimulation over the left anterior temporal lobe during memory retrieval differentially affects true and false recognition in the DRM task. European Journal of Neuroscience. 54(2). 4609–4620. 4 indexed citations
15.
Greene, Ciara M., et al.. (2021). Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and psychological distress during lockdown due to COVID‐19. International Journal of Psychology. 57(3). 315–324. 32 indexed citations
16.
Greene, Ciara M., et al.. (2021). The medium and the message: Comparing the effectiveness of six methods of misinformation delivery in an eyewitness memory paradigm.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 28(4). 677–693. 10 indexed citations
17.
Levine, Linda J., Gillian Murphy, Heather C. Lench, et al.. (2021). Remembering facts versus feelings in the wake of political events. Cognition & Emotion. 35(5). 936–955. 10 indexed citations
18.
Greene, Ciara M., Robert A. Nash, & Gillian Murphy. (2021). Misremembering Brexit: partisan bias and individual predictors of false memories for fake news stories among Brexit voters. Memory. 29(5). 587–604. 38 indexed citations
19.
Murphy, Gillian, Elizabeth F. Loftus, Rebecca Hofstein Grady, Linda J. Levine, & Ciara M. Greene. (2020). Fool me twice: how effective is debriefing in false memory studies?. Memory. 28(7). 938–949. 25 indexed citations
20.
Murphy, Gillian, Elizabeth F. Loftus, Rebecca Hofstein Grady, Linda J. Levine, & Ciara M. Greene. (2019). False Memories for Fake News During Ireland’s Abortion Referendum. Psychological Science. 30(10). 1449–1459. 86 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026