Daniel W. Heck

71 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Daniel W. Heck
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • General Decision Sciences 112
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 79
  • Applied Psychology 114
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 398
  • Statistics and Probability 136
Replace Matthew Kay with:
Matthew Kay United States
Gregory Francis United States
Reinoud D. Stoel Netherlands
Christopher R. Madan United Kingdom
Adam N. Sanborn United Kingdom
Thomas D. Wickens United States
Dylan Molenaar Netherlands
Alex O. Holcombe Australia
Reuben Hersh United States
Geoffrey Iverson United States
Daniel W. Heck relative to Matthew Kay United States Matthew Kay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.3×
Matthew Kay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel W. Heck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel W. Heck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel W. Heck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel W. Heck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel W. Heck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel W. Heck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel W. Heck. The network helps show where Daniel W. Heck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel W. Heck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel W. Heck Line = papers co-authored together Daniel W. Heck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017110
2 2017103
3 201898
4 200384
5 201169
6 200959
7 201755
8 202151
9 201349
10 201645
11 201845
12 201644
13 201834
14 201933
15 201833
16 202329
17 201729
18 201828
19 201728
20 201928

About Daniel W. Heck

Daniel W. Heck is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Cognitive Neuroscience, Statistics and Probability, Sociology and Political Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (17 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (9 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (8 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (7 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers) and Personality Traits and Psychology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (112 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (79 citations), Applied Psychology (114 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (398 citations) and Statistics and Probability (136 citations). Daniel W. Heck has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin E. Hilbig, Edgar Erdfelder, Morten Moshagen, Isabel Thielmann, Eric‐Jan Wagenmakers, Quentin F. Gronau, Thomas Schlömer, Nina R. Arnold, Oliver Deußen and Denis Arnold. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Psychological Methods, Behavior Research Methods, Psychometrika and Judgment and Decision Making.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact