Thomas Schlömer

900 total citations
11 papers, 630 citations indexed

About

Thomas Schlömer is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design and Computational Mechanics. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Schlömer has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 630 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 5 papers in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design and 3 papers in Computational Mechanics. Recurrent topics in Thomas Schlömer's work include Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (4 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (3 papers) and Digital Image Processing Techniques (2 papers). Thomas Schlömer is often cited by papers focused on Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (4 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (3 papers) and Digital Image Processing Techniques (2 papers). Thomas Schlömer collaborates with scholars based in Germany. Thomas Schlömer's co-authors include Oliver Deußen, Susanne Boll, Niels Henze, Benjamin Poppinga, Michael Balzer, Daniel W. Heck, Steffen Frey, Carsten Dachsbacher, Sebastian Grottel and Thomas Ertl and has published in prestigious journals such as ACM Transactions on Graphics, Computer Graphics Forum and KOPS (University of Konstanz).

In The Last Decade

Thomas Schlömer

10 papers receiving 592 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas Schlömer Germany	9	318	234	216	138	96	11	630
Jay Busch United States	18	927 2.9×	176 0.8×	460 2.1×	242 1.8×	53 0.6×	34	1.1k
Marco Salvi United Kingdom	15	768 2.4×	226 1.0×	469 2.2×	163 1.2×	112 1.2×	22	1.0k
Xueming Yu United States	12	578 1.8×	155 0.7×	270 1.3×	164 1.2×	44 0.5×	26	729
Christian Richardt United Kingdom	18	1.5k 4.7×	169 0.7×	477 2.2×	304 2.2×	56 0.6×	60	1.7k
Anton Kaplanyan Germany	19	1.3k 4.0×	269 1.1×	872 4.0×	338 2.4×	150 1.6×	41	1.6k
Bernhard Eberhardt Germany	11	553 1.7×	87 0.4×	248 1.1×	291 2.1×	17 0.2×	34	957
Graham Fyffe United States	18	1.4k 4.5×	129 0.6×	731 3.4×	432 3.1×	41 0.4×	41	1.6k
Jong-Il Park South Korea	14	393 1.2×	187 0.8×	31 0.1×	35 0.3×	35 0.4×	115	791
Irene Viola Netherlands	15	552 1.7×	95 0.4×	197 0.9×	223 1.6×	41 0.4×	55	737
Shohei Mori Japan	14	363 1.1×	229 1.0×	53 0.2×	26 0.2×	82 0.9×	74	860

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Schlömer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Schlömer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Schlömer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Schlömer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Schlömer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Schlömer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Schlömer. The network helps show where Thomas Schlömer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Schlömer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Schlömer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Schlömer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Schlömer. Thomas Schlömer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Heck, Daniel W., Thomas Schlömer, & Oliver Deußen. (2013). Blue noise sampling with controlled aliasing. ACM Transactions on Graphics. 32(3). 1–12. 49 indexed citations

2.

Heck, Daniel W., Thomas Schlömer, & Oliver Deußen. (2012). Aliasing-Free Blue Noise Sampling. KOPS (University of Konstanz).

3.

Frey, Steffen, Thomas Schlömer, Sebastian Grottel, et al.. (2011). Loose capacity-constrained representatives for the qualitative visual analysis in molecular dynamics. KOPS (University of Konstanz). 51–58. 9 indexed citations

4.

Schlömer, Thomas, Daniel W. Heck, & Oliver Deußen. (2011). Farthest-point optimized point sets with maximized minimum distance. KOPS (University of Konstanz). 135–142. 69 indexed citations

5.

Schlömer, Thomas & Oliver Deußen. (2011). Accurate Spectral Analysis of Two-Dimensional Point Sets. KOPS (University of Konstanz). 15(3). 152–160. 26 indexed citations

6.

Schlömer, Thomas & Oliver Deußen. (2010). Towards a Standardized Spectral Analysis of Point Sets with Applications in Graphics. KOPS (University of Konstanz). 9 indexed citations

7.

Schlömer, Thomas & Oliver Deußen. (2010). Semi‐Stochastic Tilings for Example‐Based Texture Synthesis. Computer Graphics Forum. 29(4). 1431–1439. 4 indexed citations

8.

Balzer, Michael, Thomas Schlömer, & Oliver Deußen. (2009). Capacity-constrained point distributions. ACM Transactions on Graphics. 28(3). 1–8. 136 indexed citations

9.

Balzer, Michael, Thomas Schlömer, & Oliver Deußen. (2009). Capacity-constrained point distributions. 1–8. 25 indexed citations

10.

Schlömer, Thomas, Benjamin Poppinga, Niels Henze, & Susanne Boll. (2008). Gesture recognition with a Wii controller. 11–14. 294 indexed citations

11.

Schlömer, Thomas, et al.. (2004). Adaptable setup for performance driven facial animation. 54–54. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact