Daniel R. Berry

2.0k citations
19 papers · 563 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel R. Berry

18 papers receiving 551 citations

Peers

Daniel R. Berry
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Health Informatics 19
  • Clinical Psychology 243
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 195
  • Applied Psychology 41
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 87
Replace Nele De Witte with:
Nele De Witte Belgium
Flavia Marino Italy
Sabine Doebel United States
Chui‐De Chiu Hong Kong
Margarete Schauer Germany
Daniel Fuentes Brazil
Nicholas D. Thomson United States
Ken Prkachin Canada
Luís Valero Aguayo Spain
Inmaculada Baixauli Spain
Daniel R. Berry relative to Nele De Witte Belgium Nele De Witte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Nele De Witte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel R. Berry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel R. Berry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel R. Berry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel R. Berry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel R. Berry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel R. Berry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel R. Berry. The network helps show where Daniel R. Berry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel R. Berry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel R. Berry Line = papers co-authored together Daniel R. Berry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2018110
2 2010105
3 202077
4 201167
5 201954
6 201644
7 202226
8 202119
9 202213
10 201913
11 202213
12 20239
13 20233
14 20233
15 20162
16 20172
17
Manipulating Paradigm and Attention via a Mindfulness Meditation Training Program Improves P300-Based BCI.
20112
18 20181
19 20240

About Daniel R. Berry

Daniel R. Berry is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 563 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (12 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (19 citations), Clinical Psychology (243 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (195 citations), Applied Psychology (41 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (87 citations). Daniel R. Berry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Eric W. Sellers, Kirk Warren Brown, Chad E. Lakey, Jordan T. Quaglia, Jeffrey Green, Robert J. Goodman, Athena H. Cairo, David B. Ryan, George Townsend and Tim Chadborn. Their work appears in journals such as Mindfulness, Social Neuroscience, BMC Family Practice, Journal of Neural Engineering and Social and Personality Psychology Compass.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact