Anna Sallis

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
29 papers, 865 citations indexed

About

Anna Sallis is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Sallis has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 865 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in General Health Professions, 11 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and 9 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Anna Sallis's work include Antibiotic Use and Resistance (11 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (9 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (8 papers). Anna Sallis is often cited by papers focused on Antibiotic Use and Resistance (11 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (9 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (8 papers). Anna Sallis collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Qatar. Anna Sallis's co-authors include Tim Chadborn, Michael Sanders, Michael Hallsworth, Daniel J. Berry, Sally C. Davies, Felix Greaves, Ivo Vlaev, Susan Hopkins, Diane Ashiru‐Oredope and Natalie Gold and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Anna Sallis

28 papers receiving 848 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Provision of social norm feedback to high prescribers of antibiotics in general practice: a pragmatic national randomised controlled trial

2016 292 citations Michael Hallsworth, Tim Chadborn et al. The Lancet profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anna Sallis United Kingdom	15	449	299	157	105	93	29	865
Sanjoti Parekh Australia	12	420 0.9×	204 0.7×	207 1.3×	111 1.1×	158 1.7×	24	921
Robin Ireland United Kingdom	19	230 0.5×	182 0.6×	353 2.2×	131 1.2×	62 0.7×	49	1.0k
Emma Kirby Australia	26	806 1.8×	505 1.7×	661 4.2×	109 1.0×	31 0.3×	99	1.9k
Katri Hämeen‐Anttila Finland	19	339 0.8×	134 0.4×	505 3.2×	101 1.0×	27 0.3×	64	1.3k
Marta Röing Sweden	16	406 0.9×	111 0.4×	143 0.9×	82 0.8×	14 0.2×	26	805
Seng Fah Tong Malaysia	18	404 0.9×	33 0.1×	215 1.4×	168 1.6×	34 0.4×	68	1.3k
Kelli McCormack Brown United States	14	184 0.4×	131 0.4×	102 0.6×	57 0.5×	31 0.3×	37	561
Catherine Henshall United Kingdom	15	486 1.1×	49 0.2×	219 1.4×	76 0.7×	89 1.0×	66	1.0k
Mahmood Karimy Iran	22	368 0.8×	49 0.2×	172 1.1×	244 2.3×	118 1.3×	116	1.4k
C. James Frankish Canada	15	599 1.3×	60 0.2×	84 0.5×	77 0.7×	23 0.2×	29	866

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Sallis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Sallis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Sallis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Sallis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Sallis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Sallis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Sallis. The network helps show where Anna Sallis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Sallis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Sallis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Sallis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Sallis. Anna Sallis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Gold, Natalie, et al.. (2022). Using text and charts to provide social norm feedback to general practices with high overall and high broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing: a series of national randomised controlled trials. Trials. 23(1). 511–511. 2 indexed citations

Ayorinde, Abimbola, Felicity Boardman, Lucy Porter, et al.. (2021). Enabling women to access preferred methods of contraception: a rapid review and behavioural analysis. BMC Public Health. 21(1). 2176–2176. 3 indexed citations

Golding, Sarah E., et al.. (2021). Interventions to change purchasing behaviour in supermarkets: a systematic review and intervention content analysis. Health Psychology Review. 16(2). 305–345. 13 indexed citations

Porter, Lucy, Anna Sallis, Sarah Payne, et al.. (2021). A randomised experiment of health, cost and social norm message frames to encourage acceptance of swaps in a simulation online supermarket. PLoS ONE. 16(2). e0246455–e0246455. 12 indexed citations

Gold, Natalie, et al.. (2021). Provision of social-norms feedback to general practices whose antibiotic prescribing is increasing: a national randomized controlled trial. Journal of Public Health. 30(10). 2351–2358. 4 indexed citations

Haighton, Catherine, Dorothy Newbury‐Birch, Anna Sallis, et al.. (2021). Optimizing Making Every Contact Count (MECC) interventions: A strategic behavioral analysis.. Health Psychology. 40(12). 960–973. 18 indexed citations

Ashiru‐Oredope, Diane, Tracey Thornley, Ayoub Saei, et al.. (2020). Improving Management of Respiratory Tract Infections in Community Pharmacies and Promoting Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Cluster Randomised Control Trial with a Self-Report Behavioural Questionnaire and Process Evaluation. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8(1). 44–44. 11 indexed citations

Borek, Aleksandra, Marta Wanat, Lou Atkins, et al.. (2020). Optimising antimicrobial stewardship interventions in English primary care: a behavioural analysis of qualitative and intervention studies. BMJ Open. 10(12). e039284–e039284. 14 indexed citations

Atkins, Lou, Anna Sallis, Tim Chadborn, et al.. (2020). Reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators and strategic behavioural analysis of interventions. Implementation Science. 15(1). 44–44. 61 indexed citations

10.

Roope, Laurence, Sarah Tonkin‐Crine, Natalie Herd, et al.. (2020). Reducing expectations for antibiotics in primary care: a randomised experiment to test the response to fear-based messages about antimicrobial resistance. BMC Medicine. 18(1). 110–110. 31 indexed citations

11.

Sallis, Anna, Paulina Bondaronek, Ly‐Mee Yu, et al.. (2020). Prescriber Commitment Posters to Increase Prudent Antibiotic Prescribing in English General Practice: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Antibiotics. 9(8). 490–490. 3 indexed citations

12.

Sallis, Anna, Joseph Sherlock, Ayoub Saei, et al.. (2019). Pre-notification and reminder SMS text messages with behaviourally informed invitation letters to improve uptake of NHS Health Checks: a factorial randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 19(1). 1162–1162. 36 indexed citations

13.

Sallis, Anna, Rachel Howard, Laura J. Brown, et al.. (2019). Improving child weight management uptake through enhanced National Child Measurement Programme parental feedback letters: A randomised controlled trial. Preventive Medicine. 121. 128–135. 21 indexed citations

14.

Sallis, Anna, Natalie Gold, Adeola Agbebiyi, et al.. (2019). Increasing uptake of National Health Service Health Checks in primary care: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of enhanced invitation letters in Northamptonshire, England. Journal of Public Health. 43(1). e92–e99. 12 indexed citations

15.

Bhattacharya, Alex, Susan Hopkins, Anna Sallis, Emma Budd, & Diane Ashiru‐Oredope. (2016). A process evaluation of the UK-wide Antibiotic Guardian campaign: developing engagement on antimicrobial resistance. Journal of Public Health. 39(2). e40–e47. 29 indexed citations

16.

Sallis, Anna, et al.. (2016). The effectiveness of an enhanced invitation letter on uptake of National Health Service Health Checks in primary care: a pragmatic quasi-randomised controlled trial. BMC Family Practice. 17(1). 35–35. 42 indexed citations

17.

Hallsworth, Michael, Tim Chadborn, Anna Sallis, et al.. (2016). Provision of social norm feedback to high prescribers of antibiotics in general practice: a pragmatic national randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 387(10029). 1743–1752. 292 indexed citations breakdown →

18.

Hallsworth, Michael, Michael Sanders, Anna Sallis, et al.. (2015). Stating Appointment Costs in SMS Reminders Reduces Missed Hospital Appointments: Findings from Two Randomised Controlled Trials. PLoS ONE. 10(9). e0137306–e0137306. 61 indexed citations

19.

Sallis, Anna, et al.. (2013). Experiences of Work and Sickness Absence in Employees with Depression: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 24(3). 469–483. 27 indexed citations

20.

Sallis, Anna, et al.. (2010). Working towards a ‘fit note’: an experimental vignette survey of GPs. British Journal of General Practice. 60(573). 245–250. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact