Nicholas D. Thomson
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Luna C. Muñoz CentifantiJasmin VassilevaKent A. KiehlMichel B. AboutanosJames M. BjorkGraham TowlKostas A. FantiSteven M. Gillespie
- Topics
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (36 papers)Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (15 papers)Crime Patterns and Interventions (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomBulgaria
In The Last Decade
Nicholas D. Thomson
55 papers receiving 533 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Clinical Psychology 428
- Sociology and Political Science 210
- Social Psychology 160
- Cognitive Neuroscience 64
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 60
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas D. Thomson
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas D. Thomson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas D. Thomson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas D. Thomson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas D. Thomson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas D. Thomson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas D. Thomson. The network helps show where Nicholas D. Thomson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas D. Thomson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas D. Thomson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas D. Thomson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas D. Thomson. Nicholas D. Thomson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 58 | |
| 20 | 31 |
About Nicholas D. Thomson
Nicholas D. Thomson is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Health, having authored 64 papers that have together received 553 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (36 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (15 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (428 citations), Social Psychology (160 citations) and Health (50 citations). Nicholas D. Thomson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Luna C. Muñoz Centifanti, Jasmin Vassileva, Kent A. Kiehl, Michel B. Aboutanos, James M. Bjork, Graham Towl, Kostas A. Fanti, Steven M. Gillespie, Theodore P. Beauchaine and Craig S. Neumann. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, American Journal of Psychiatry and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.