Carrie Jenkins
- Philosophy top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 1%
- Clinical Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- S. Darius TandonAnne K. DugganDaniel NolanMargaret P. PoeRick ParentéRoger J. MullinsMegan MeyerJonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
- Topics
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (13 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 papers)Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers)
- Journals
- Technological Forecasting and Social ChangeThe Journal of PhilosophyThe Philosophical Quarterly
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Carrie Jenkins
23 papers receiving 366 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Philosophy 242
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 231
- History and Philosophy of Science 116
- Clinical Psychology 56
- Cognitive Neuroscience 47
Countries citing papers authored by Carrie Jenkins
This map shows the geographic impact of Carrie Jenkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carrie Jenkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carrie Jenkins more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Carrie Jenkins
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carrie Jenkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carrie Jenkins. The network helps show where Carrie Jenkins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carrie Jenkins
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carrie Jenkins. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carrie Jenkins based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carrie Jenkins. Carrie Jenkins is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | What Love Is: And What It Could Be | 2 |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 144 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Liar-Like Paradox and Object-Language Features | 1 |
| 10 | Boghossian and Epistemic Analyticity | 3 |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | EPISTEMIC NORMS AND NATURAL FACTS | 9 |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | REALISM AND INDEPENDENCE | 28 |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 57 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About Carrie Jenkins
Carrie Jenkins is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 407 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (13 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (116 citations), Philosophy (242 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (231 citations). Carrie Jenkins has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include S. Darius Tandon, Anne K. Duggan, Daniel Nolan, Margaret P. Poe, Rick Parenté, Roger J. Mullins, Megan Meyer and Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa. Their work appears in journals such as Technological Forecasting and Social Change, The Journal of Philosophy and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.