Daniel M. Lilly

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 797 citations indexed

About

Daniel M. Lilly is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology and Oceanography. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel M. Lilly has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 797 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Ecology and 2 papers in Oceanography. Recurrent topics in Daniel M. Lilly's work include Protist diversity and phylogeny (4 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (3 papers) and Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (1 paper). Daniel M. Lilly is often cited by papers focused on Protist diversity and phylogeny (4 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (3 papers) and Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (1 paper). Daniel M. Lilly collaborates with scholars based in United States and Taiwan. Daniel M. Lilly's co-authors include William H. Cevallos and Stephen Henry and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Marine Biology.

In The Last Decade

Daniel M. Lilly

9 papers receiving 677 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Probiotics: Growth-Promoting Factors Produced by Microorganisms

1965 718 citations Daniel M. Lilly et al. Science profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel M. Lilly United States	7	470	394	233	104	73	9	797
D. L. Palenzona Italy	9	534 1.1×	394 1.0×	276 1.2×	89 0.9×	49 0.7×	26	798
D. A. Shapton	5	253 0.5×	277 0.7×	81 0.3×	17 0.2×	87 1.2×	5	658
John Smart New Zealand	11	728 1.5×	587 1.5×	457 2.0×	121 1.2×	65 0.9×	13	1.1k
S. Vuković Croatia	4	622 1.3×	444 1.1×	303 1.3×	19 0.2×	71 1.0×	6	792
Lynn K. Carmichael United States	3	284 0.6×	802 2.0×	168 0.7×	128 1.2×	26 0.4×	3	1.1k
R. Reniero Switzerland	8	545 1.2×	445 1.1×	304 1.3×	65 0.6×	35 0.5×	12	679
Valerie J. Russell Spain	10	175 0.4×	628 1.6×	52 0.2×	120 1.2×	92 1.3×	10	738
Koji Nagashima Japan	14	108 0.2×	487 1.2×	84 0.4×	118 1.1×	28 0.4×	24	851
David Miñana‐Galbis Spain	12	295 0.6×	569 1.4×	102 0.4×	42 0.4×	45 0.6×	25	1.0k
Päivi Nurminen United States	10	335 0.7×	483 1.2×	182 0.8×	59 0.6×	207 2.8×	13	971

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel M. Lilly

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel M. Lilly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel M. Lilly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel M. Lilly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel M. Lilly

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel M. Lilly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel M. Lilly. The network helps show where Daniel M. Lilly may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel M. Lilly

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel M. Lilly. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel M. Lilly based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel M. Lilly. Daniel M. Lilly is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Lilly, Daniel M., et al.. (1974). Growth of Uronema marinum in chemically defined medium. Marine Biology. 26(2). 153–160. 18 indexed citations

2.

Lilly, Daniel M., et al.. (1965). Probiotics: Growth-Promoting Factors Produced by Microorganisms. Science. 147(3659). 747–748. 718 indexed citations breakdown →

3.

Lilly, Daniel M., et al.. (1961). A Protein Factor in the Nutrition of Paramecium caudatum. Journal of General Microbiology. 24(3). 327–334. 7 indexed citations

4.

Lilly, Daniel M., et al.. (1960). Growth determinations in Paramecium caudatum by the formazan reaction. 138(3). 333. 7 indexed citations

5.

Lilly, Daniel M. & William H. Cevallos. (1956). II. CHEMICAL SUPPLEMENTS PROMOTING GROWTH IN CARNIVOROUS CILIATES*. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences. 18(6 Series II). 531–539. 10 indexed citations

6.

Lilly, Daniel M. & Stephen Henry. (1956). Supplementary Factors in the Nutrition of Euplotes.*. The Journal of Protozoology. 3(4). 200–203. 2 indexed citations

7.

Lilly, Daniel M., et al.. (1956). SECTION OF BIOLOGY: FACTORS INFLUENCING GROWTH IN PROTOZOA: I. FACTORS INFLUENCING ABNORMAL GROWTH IN SUCTORIAN PROTOZOA*. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences. 18(6 Series II). 522–531. 2 indexed citations

8.

Lilly, Daniel M.. (1953). THE NUTRITION OF CARNIVOROUS PROTOZOA. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 56(5). 910–920. 24 indexed citations

9.

Lilly, Daniel M., et al.. (1953). Growth Promotion in Carnivorous Protozoa by Substituted Purines.. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 83(3). 434–438. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact