Daniel Klement

21 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers

Daniel Klement
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 127
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 163
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 170
  • Computer Science Applications 42
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 26
Replace Robert L. Dunbar with:
Robert L. Dunbar United States
Orit Furman Israel
Jing Fang China
Rachel C. Lazarus United States
Elise Demeter United States
Robert E. Kemm Australia
Edwin R. Griff United States
Kacy Redd United States
Anne Nørremølle Denmark
Myrthe Faber Netherlands
Daniel Klement relative to Robert L. Dunbar United States Robert L. Dunbar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Robert L. Dunbar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Klement

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Klement's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Klement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Klement more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Klement

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Klement. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Klement. The network helps show where Daniel Klement may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Klement, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Klement Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Klement links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011135
2 200678
3 200644
4 199641
5 201725
6 200522
7 200612
8 201512
9 201011
10 200010
11 20129
12 19978
13 20086
14 20096
15 20195
16 20095
17 20145
18 20124
19 20183
20 20093

About Daniel Klement

Daniel Klement is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory and Neural Mechanisms (14 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (10 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (4 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (127 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (163 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (170 citations), Computer Science Applications (42 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (26 citations). Daniel Klement has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Cyril Brom, André A. Fenton, Andrey V. Olypher, Aleš Stuchlı́k, Tereza Nekovářová, Vĕra Bubeníková‐Valešová, Karel Valeš, Eva Pastalkova, H. W. Kniemeyer and Andreas Greinacher. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioural Brain Research, Physiological Research, Hippocampus, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Primates.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026