Daniel J. Van Ingen

423 citations
10 papers · 270 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel J. Van Ingen

10 papers receiving 254 citations

Peers

Daniel J. Van Ingen
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Clinical Psychology 154
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 46
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 44
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 64
  • Safety Research 18
Replace Pieter Vos with:
Pieter Vos Belgium
Evelien Broekhof Netherlands
Sim Yin Tan United States
Tracy G. Cassels Canada
Johanna Koerting United Kingdom
J. Marieke Buil Netherlands
Marianne C. Kasius Netherlands
Vera Munde Netherlands
Maria Plötner Germany
Laura Ruglioni Italy
Daniel J. Van Ingen relative to Pieter Vos Belgium Pieter Vos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Pieter Vos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Van Ingen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Van Ingen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Van Ingen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Van Ingen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Van Ingen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Van Ingen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Van Ingen. The network helps show where Daniel J. Van Ingen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Van Ingen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Van Ingen Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Van Ingen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2015116
2 201129
3 200926
4 200926
5 201021
6 201317
7 201212
8 200812
9 20099
10 20102

About Daniel J. Van Ingen

Daniel J. Van Ingen is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 10 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (3 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Family Support in Illness (2 papers) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (154 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (46 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (44 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (64 citations) and Safety Research (18 citations). Daniel J. Van Ingen has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Linda L. Moore, Stacy R. Freiheit, Johannes Rojahn, Jesse A. Steinfeldt, Amber Roberts, David J. Wimer, Linda W. Moore, Ellen W. Rowe, J. Rojahn and Nicole Turygin. Their work appears in journals such as Research in Developmental Disabilities, Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research and Professional Psychology Research and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact