Daniel J. Faso

1.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
14 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Daniel J. Faso is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel J. Faso has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Clinical Psychology, 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 5 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Daniel J. Faso's work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (12 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (6 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (5 papers). Daniel J. Faso is often cited by papers focused on Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (12 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (6 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (5 papers). Daniel J. Faso collaborates with scholars based in United States. Daniel J. Faso's co-authors include Noah J. Sasson, Kristin D. Neff, Kerrianne E. Morrison, Jack Nugent, Daniel P. Kennedy, Ruth B. Grossman, Kilee M. DeBrabander, Amy E. Pinkham, Desiree R. Jones and Robert A. Ackerman and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Personality and Individual Differences and Schizophrenia Bulletin.

In The Last Decade

Daniel J. Faso

14 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories sort by overperformance

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Neurotypical Peers are Less Willing to Interact with Those with Autism based on Thin Slice Judgments

2017 348 citations Noah J. Sasson, Daniel J. Faso et al. Scientific Reports profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel J. Faso United States	12	921	735	275	267	141	14	1.2k
Tamara C. Daley United States	15	702 0.8×	708 1.0×	321 1.2×	167 0.6×	250 1.8×	34	1.1k
Lucy A. Livingston United Kingdom	18	1.1k 1.1×	572 0.8×	292 1.1×	234 0.9×	243 1.7×	38	1.2k
Megan Clark Australia	18	608 0.7×	622 0.8×	420 1.5×	195 0.7×	230 1.6×	51	1.1k
Catherine J Crompton United Kingdom	13	803 0.9×	543 0.7×	275 1.0×	200 0.7×	135 1.0×	39	987
Carole Buckley United Kingdom	7	1.2k 1.3×	847 1.2×	292 1.1×	266 1.0×	290 2.1×	13	1.5k
Nathalie Nader‐Grosbois Belgium	16	420 0.5×	524 0.7×	207 0.8×	340 1.3×	102 0.7×	75	851
Monique Botha United Kingdom	14	1.0k 1.1×	790 1.1×	245 0.9×	188 0.7×	163 1.2×	23	1.3k
Heather J. Nuske United States	17	662 0.7×	457 0.6×	180 0.7×	228 0.9×	163 1.2×	39	886
Patricia Prelock United States	25	871 0.9×	797 1.1×	243 0.9×	950 3.6×	216 1.5×	79	1.7k
Michael Alessandri United States	18	873 0.9×	718 1.0×	213 0.8×	232 0.9×	340 2.4×	44	1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Faso

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Faso's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Faso with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Faso more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Faso

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Faso. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Faso. The network helps show where Daniel J. Faso may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel J. Faso

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel J. Faso. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel J. Faso based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel J. Faso. Daniel J. Faso is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

DeBrabander, Kilee M., et al.. (2019). Do First Impressions of Autistic Adults Differ Between Autistic and Nonautistic Observers?. Autism in Adulthood. 1(4). 250–257. 67 indexed citations

Morrison, Kerrianne E., Kilee M. DeBrabander, Daniel J. Faso, & Noah J. Sasson. (2019). Variability in first impressions of autistic adults made by neurotypical raters is driven more by characteristics of the rater than by characteristics of autistic adults. Autism. 23(7). 1817–1829. 91 indexed citations

Morrison, Kerrianne E., Kilee M. DeBrabander, Desiree R. Jones, et al.. (2019). Outcomes of real-world social interaction for autistic adults paired with autistic compared to typically developing partners. Autism. 24(5). 1067–1080. 133 indexed citations

Morrison, Kerrianne E., et al.. (2018). The content and function of interests in the broad autism phenotype. Research in autism spectrum disorders. 49. 25–33. 16 indexed citations

Sasson, Noah J., Kerrianne E. Morrison, Amy E. Pinkham, Daniel J. Faso, & Michael S. Chmielewski. (2018). Brief Report: Adults with Autism are Less Accurate at Predicting How Their Personality Traits are Evaluated by Unfamiliar Observers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 48(6). 2243–2248. 9 indexed citations

Sasson, Noah J., et al.. (2017). Neurotypical Peers are Less Willing to Interact with Those with Autism based on Thin Slice Judgments. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 40700–40700. 348 indexed citations breakdown →

Faso, Daniel J., et al.. (2017). Production and perception of emotional prosody by adults with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research. 10(12). 1991–2001. 51 indexed citations

Sasson, Noah J., et al.. (2015). Context Effects on Facial Affect Recognition in Schizophrenia and Autism: Behavioral and Eye-Tracking Evidence. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 42(3). 675–683. 76 indexed citations

Faso, Daniel J., et al.. (2015). The broad autism phenotype predicts relationship outcomes in newly formed college roommates. Autism. 20(4). 412–424. 27 indexed citations

10.

Hubbard, Nicholas A., Daniel J. Faso, Daniel C. Krawczyk, & Bart Rypma. (2015). The dual roles of trait rumination in problem solving. Personality and Individual Differences. 86. 321–325. 10 indexed citations

11.

Neff, Kristin D. & Daniel J. Faso. (2014). Self-Compassion and Well-Being in Parents of Children with Autism. Mindfulness. 6(4). 938–947. 192 indexed citations

12.

Faso, Daniel J., Noah J. Sasson, & Amy E. Pinkham. (2014). Evaluating Posed and Evoked Facial Expressions of Emotion from Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 45(1). 75–89. 109 indexed citations

13.

Sasson, Noah J., Daniel J. Faso, Morgan Parlier, Julie L. Daniels, & Joseph Piven. (2014). When Father Doesn't Know Best: Selective Disagreement Between Self‐Report and Informant Report of the Broad Autism Phenotype in Parents of a Child with Autism. Autism Research. 7(6). 731–739. 18 indexed citations

14.

Faso, Daniel J., et al.. (2012). Vicarious futurity, hope, and well-being in parents of children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in autism spectrum disorders. 7(2). 288–297. 48 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact