Daniel J. Brooks

5.0k citations
98 papers · 2.8k indexed · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel J. Brooks

94 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Daniel J. Brooks
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 767
  • Pharmacology 708
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 312
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 580
  • Toxicology 92
Replace Martin Marziniak with:
Martin Marziniak Germany
Peter Flachenecker Germany
Panu Hakola Finland
Ronaldo F. Enriquez Australia
Marie D’hooghe Belgium
Zoran Zimolo United States
P. Bettica Italy
Jun Sato Japan
Mauricio R. Delgado United States
Michael Johnson United States
Daniel J. Brooks relative to Martin Marziniak Germany Martin Marziniak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.1×
Martin Marziniak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Brooks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Brooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Brooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Brooks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Brooks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Brooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Brooks. The network helps show where Daniel J. Brooks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Brooks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Brooks Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Brooks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20241
3 20236
4 20232
5 20217
6 202110
7 202132
8 202112
9 201930
10 201819
11 201515
12 2014159
13 2010117
14 201076
15 20109
16 200935
17 200911
18 2006151
19
Rasagiline treatment can improve freezing of gait in advanced Parkinson's disease; a prospective randomised double blind, placebo and entacapone controlled study.
200417
20 200497

About Daniel J. Brooks

Daniel J. Brooks is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Oncology and Neurology, having authored 98 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone health and treatments (18 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (17 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (17 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (17 papers), Bone Metabolism and Diseases (17 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (11 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (11 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (767 citations), Pharmacology (708 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (312 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (580 citations) and Toxicology (92 citations). Daniel J. Brooks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Frances R. Levin, John J. Mariani, Edward V. Nunes, Suzette M. Evans, Mary Bouxsein, Martina Pavlicová, Fatima Garawi, Amy L. Mahony, Wendy Y. Cheng and Glenda M. Halliday. Their work appears in journals such as Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, Bone, The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse and Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026