Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
THE PPMXL CATALOG OF POSITIONS AND PROPER MOTIONS ON THE ICRS. COMBINING USNO-B1.0 AND THE TWO MICRON ALL SKY SURVEY (2MASS)
2010475 citationsS. Roêser, Markus Demleitner et al.The Astronomical Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Markus Demleitner
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Markus Demleitner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Markus Demleitner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Markus Demleitner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Markus Demleitner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Markus Demleitner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Markus Demleitner. The network helps show where Markus Demleitner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Markus Demleitner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Markus Demleitner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Markus Demleitner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Markus Demleitner. Markus Demleitner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Roêser, S., et al.. (2017). Hot Stuff for One Year (HSOY). Astronomy and Astrophysics. 600. L4–L4.51 indexed citations
11.
Rauch, T., et al.. (2017). Stellar laboratories. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 606. A105–A105.20 indexed citations
12.
Demleitner, Markus, Gretchen Greene, Pierre Le Sidaner, & Raymond Plante. (2016). The Virtual Observatory Registry.2 indexed citations
13.
Rauch, T., et al.. (2016). Stellar laboratories. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 590. A128–A128.19 indexed citations
14.
Rauch, T., et al.. (2016). Stellar laboratories. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 599. A142–A142.19 indexed citations
15.
Rauch, T., et al.. (2015). Stellar laboratories. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 587. A39–A39.24 indexed citations
16.
Demleitner, Markus, Gerard Lemson, T. Rauch, et al.. (2007). The German Astrophysical Virtual Observatory (GAVO): Archives and Applications, Status and Services. 328(7). 713.1 indexed citations
17.
Kurtz, Michael J., G. Eichhorn, Alberto Accomazzi, et al.. (2005). The bibliometric properties of article readership information: Research Articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2). 111–128.16 indexed citations
18.
Pirzkal, Nor, A. Pasquali, & Markus Demleitner. (2001). Extracting ACS Slitless Spectra with aXe. 29. 5.3 indexed citations
19.
Demleitner, Markus, et al.. (2001). ADS's Dexter Data Extraction Applet. ASPC. 238. 321.3 indexed citations
20.
Demleitner, Markus, et al.. (1999). Looking at 3,000,000 References Without Growing Grey Hair. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. 195.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.