Daniel Hill
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 5
- Co-authors
- David Kleinfeld (2 shared papers)Samar Mehta (1 shared paper)Arthur Konnerth (3 shared papers)Christine Grienberger (2 shared papers)Nathalie L. Rochefort (2 shared papers)Jeffrey D. Moore (1 shared paper)John C. Curtis (1 shared paper)Nima Marandi (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neuron (2 papers)Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring (1 paper)Progress in Retinal and Eye Research (1 paper)Pharmaceuticals (1 paper)Journal of Neuroscience (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Daniel Hill
14 papers receiving 831 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Cognitive Neuroscience 566
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 519
- Neurology 84
- Sensory Systems 34
- Ophthalmology 54
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Hill
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Hill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Hill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Hill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Hill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Hill. The network helps show where Daniel Hill may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Hill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 292 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 135 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 130 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 108 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 57 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 40 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 0 |
About Daniel Hill
Daniel Hill is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 15 papers that have together received 839 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (6 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (566 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (519 citations), Neurology (84 citations), Sensory Systems (34 citations) and Ophthalmology (54 citations). Daniel Hill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David Kleinfeld, Samar Mehta, Arthur Konnerth, Christine Grienberger, Nathalie L. Rochefort, Jeffrey D. Moore, John C. Curtis, Nima Marandi, Madoka Narushima and M. Francesca Cordeiro. Their work appears in journals such as Neuron, Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, Pharmaceuticals and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.