John Maddison

16 papers receiving 535 citations

Hit Papers

Deep learning for prediction of colorectal cancer outcome: a discovery and validation study 2020 · 393 citations
3932020202620222024100200300

Peers

John Maddison
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Health Informatics 37
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 295
  • Ophthalmology 63
  • Oncology 189
  • Artificial Intelligence 215
Replace Meriem Sefta with:
Meriem Sefta France
Benoît Schmauch France
Xiao Hu China
Mehdi Alilou United States
Jefree J. Schulte United States
Leigh Conroy Canada
Sepp de Raedt Denmark
Ole-Johan Skrede United Kingdom
Lily H. Peng United States
John Maddison relative to Meriem Sefta France Meriem Sefta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Meriem Sefta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Maddison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Maddison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Maddison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Maddison more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Maddison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Maddison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Maddison. The network helps show where John Maddison may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Maddison, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Maddison Line = papers co-authored together John Maddison links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1
Deep learning for prediction of colorectal cancer outcome: a discovery and validation study
Hit paper breakdown →
2020393
2 202140
3 202032
4 200914
5 200513
6
Analysing the 3D Structure of Blood Vessels using Confocal Microscopy
200212
7 201411
8 20208
9 20246
10 20244
11 20253
12 20242
13 20241
14 20061
15 20001
16
3-dimensional analysis of vascular structure, function & receptor distribution using confocal laser scanning microscopy
20001
17 20240
18 20250

About John Maddison

John Maddison is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Family Practice, Health Information Management, Biophysics and Ophthalmology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 542 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (2 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (2 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (2 papers) and AI in cancer detection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (37 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (295 citations), Ophthalmology (63 citations), Oncology (189 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (215 citations). John Maddison has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Inger Nina Farstad, Sepp de Raedt, Ian Tomlinson, David N. Church, Rachel Kerr, John Arne Nesheim, Hanne A. Askautrud, Manohar Pradhan, Ole-Johan Skrede and Knut Liestøl. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Pathology, Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, Histopathology and ANZ Journal of Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026