Satoshi Shimegi
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Physiology top 5%
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Hiromichi SatoTakafumi AkasakiShogo SomaTakehiko IchikawaHirofumi OzekiTomoyuki NaitoOsamu SadakaneHironobu Osaki
- Topics
- Neural dynamics and brain function (20 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (15 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (13 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of NeuroscienceSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Satoshi Shimegi
47 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Cognitive Neuroscience 608
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 491
- Molecular Biology 295
- Physiology 102
- Physiology 74
Countries citing papers authored by Satoshi Shimegi
This map shows the geographic impact of Satoshi Shimegi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Satoshi Shimegi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Satoshi Shimegi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Satoshi Shimegi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Satoshi Shimegi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Satoshi Shimegi. The network helps show where Satoshi Shimegi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Satoshi Shimegi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Satoshi Shimegi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Satoshi Shimegi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Satoshi Shimegi. Satoshi Shimegi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 33 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 68 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 120 | |
| 17 | 67 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | The effects of exercise on bone mass in postmenopausal women | 1 |
About Satoshi Shimegi
Satoshi Shimegi is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Physiology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (20 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (15 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (608 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (491 citations) and Physiology (102 citations). Satoshi Shimegi has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Hiromichi Sato, Takafumi Akasaki, Shogo Soma, Takehiko Ichikawa, Hirofumi Ozeki, Tomoyuki Naito, Osamu Sadakane, Hironobu Osaki, Ayako Ishikawa and Fumikazu Okajima. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.