Daniel Hanus

1.8k total citations
21 papers, 959 citations indexed

About

Daniel Hanus is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Hanus has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 959 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Social Psychology, 16 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Daniel Hanus's work include Child and Animal Learning Development (16 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (14 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (4 papers). Daniel Hanus is often cited by papers focused on Child and Animal Learning Development (16 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (14 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (4 papers). Daniel Hanus collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Daniel Hanus's co-authors include Josep Call, Michael Tomasello, Felix Warneken, Brian Hare, Alicia P. Melis, Natacha Mendes, Claudio Tennie, Juliane Bräuer, Natalie Uomini and Russell D. Gray and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Current Biology and PLoS Biology.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Hanus

19 papers receiving 920 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Hanus Germany 12 570 457 245 197 195 21 959
María Victoria Hernández‐Lloreda Spain 12 658 1.2× 444 1.0× 266 1.1× 231 1.2× 225 1.2× 21 1.2k
Charles R. Menzel United States 17 678 1.2× 451 1.0× 435 1.8× 175 0.9× 110 0.6× 33 1.1k
Derek C. Penn United States 4 519 0.9× 630 1.4× 395 1.6× 186 0.9× 136 0.7× 6 1.2k
Jennifer E. Sutton Canada 16 808 1.4× 393 0.9× 313 1.3× 83 0.4× 170 0.9× 34 1.4k
Bonnie M. Perdue United States 21 549 1.0× 326 0.7× 345 1.4× 108 0.5× 45 0.2× 56 1.2k
Valérie Dufour France 21 677 1.2× 319 0.7× 328 1.3× 226 1.1× 180 0.9× 60 1.2k
Hika Kuroshima Japan 20 675 1.2× 358 0.8× 294 1.2× 213 1.1× 134 0.7× 53 1.0k
Fernando Colmenares Spain 19 560 1.0× 199 0.4× 173 0.7× 187 0.9× 99 0.5× 45 929
Tricia S. Clement United States 15 341 0.6× 326 0.7× 302 1.2× 95 0.5× 58 0.3× 25 1.1k
Jason Low New Zealand 20 367 0.6× 661 1.4× 469 1.9× 133 0.7× 84 0.4× 52 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Hanus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Hanus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Hanus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Hanus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Hanus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Hanus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Hanus. The network helps show where Daniel Hanus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Hanus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Hanus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Hanus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Hanus. Daniel Hanus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hanus, Daniel, et al.. (2025). Great apes show altercentric influences when confronted with conflicting beliefs. Animal Behaviour. 227. 123304–123304.
2.
Hanus, Daniel, Danyi Wang, Lauren H. Howard, et al.. (2025). Social attention increases object memory in adult but not younger great apes. Animal Behaviour. 221. 123081–123081.
3.
Bohn, Manuel, et al.. (2023). Great ape cognition is structured by stable cognitive abilities and predicted by developmental conditions. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 7(6). 927–938. 10 indexed citations
4.
Hanus, Daniel, Valentina Truppa, & Josep Call. (2022). Are you as fooled as I am? Visual illusions in human (Homo) and nonhuman (Sapajus, Gorilla, Pan, Pongo) primate species.. Journal of comparative psychology. 137(2). 80–89. 2 indexed citations
5.
Bohn, Manuel, et al.. (2021). A Longitudinal Study of Great Ape Cognition: Stability, Reliability and the Influence of Individual Characteristics. PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints). 4 indexed citations
6.
Tennie, Claudio, et al.. (2019). Chimpanzees use observed temporal directionality to learn novel causal relations. Primates. 60(6). 517–524. 5 indexed citations
7.
Hanus, Daniel, et al.. (2019). How prior experience and task presentation modulate innovation in 6-year-old-children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 180. 87–103. 9 indexed citations
8.
Rakoczy, Hannes, et al.. (2018). Chimpanzees Consider Humans’ Psychological States when Drawing Statistical Inferences. Current Biology. 28(12). 1959–1963.e3. 21 indexed citations
9.
Hanus, Daniel. (2016). Causal reasoning versus associative learning: A useful dichotomy or a strawman battle in comparative psychology?. Journal of comparative psychology. 130(3). 241–248. 13 indexed citations
10.
Truppa, Valentina, et al.. (2015). Does Presentation Format Influence Visual Size Discrimination in Tufted Capuchin Monkeys (Sapajus spp.)?. PLoS ONE. 10(4). e0126001–e0126001. 11 indexed citations
11.
Guen, Olivier Le, et al.. (2015). Making sense of (exceptional) causal relations. A cross-cultural and cross-linguistic study. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 3 indexed citations
12.
Hanus, Daniel & Josep Call. (2014). When maths trumps logic: probabilistic judgements in chimpanzees. Biology Letters. 10(12). 20140892–20140892. 20 indexed citations
13.
Bräuer, Juliane & Daniel Hanus. (2012). Fairness in Non-human Primates?. Social Justice Research. 25(3). 256–276. 33 indexed citations
14.
Hanus, Daniel, Natacha Mendes, Claudio Tennie, & Josep Call. (2011). Comparing the Performances of Apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus) and Human Children (Homo sapiens) in the Floating Peanut Task. PLoS ONE. 6(6). e19555–e19555. 113 indexed citations
15.
Hanus, Daniel & Josep Call. (2011). Chimpanzee problem-solving: contrasting the use of causal and arbitrary cues. Animal Cognition. 14(6). 871–878. 43 indexed citations
16.
Hanus, Daniel & Josep Call. (2008). Chimpanzees infer the location of a reward on the basis of the effect of its weight. Current Biology. 18(9). R370–R372. 46 indexed citations
17.
Warneken, Felix, Brian Hare, Alicia P. Melis, Daniel Hanus, & Michael Tomasello. (2007). Spontaneous Altruism by Chimpanzees and Young Children. PLoS Biology. 5(7). e184–e184. 346 indexed citations
18.
Mendes, Natacha, Daniel Hanus, & Josep Call. (2007). Raising the level: orangutans use water as a tool. Biology Letters. 3(5). 453–455. 85 indexed citations
19.
Hanus, Daniel & Josep Call. (2007). Discrete quantity judgments in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus): The effect of presenting whole sets versus item-by-item.. Journal of comparative psychology. 121(3). 241–249. 148 indexed citations
20.
Hanus, Daniel, Josep Call, & Michael Tomasello. (2003). Quantity-based judgments by orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) and bonobos (Pan paniscus). MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 196–197. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026