Daniel Hanus

19 papers receiving 920 citations

Peers

Daniel Hanus
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 457
  • Developmental Biology 77
  • Social Psychology 570
  • Statistics and Probability 128
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 197
Replace Bonnie M. Perdue with:
Bonnie M. Perdue United States
María Victoria Hernández‐Lloreda Spain
Derek C. Penn United States
Charles R. Menzel United States
Tricia S. Clement United States
Hika Kuroshima Japan
Audrey E. Parrish United States
Mathias Osvath Sweden
Jason Low New Zealand
Ernő Téglás United States
Daniel Hanus relative to Bonnie M. Perdue United States Bonnie M. Perdue's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Bonnie M. Perdue · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Hanus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Hanus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Hanus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Hanus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Hanus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Hanus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Hanus. The network helps show where Daniel Hanus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Hanus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Hanus Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Hanus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007346
2 2007148
3 2011113
4 200785
5 200846
6 202045
7 201143
8 201233
9 201821
10 201420
11 201613
12 201511
13 202310
14 20199
15 20195
16 20214
17 20153
18 20222
19
Quantity-based judgments by orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) and bonobos (Pan paniscus)
20032
20 20250

About Daniel Hanus

Daniel Hanus is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Statistics and Probability, having authored 21 papers that have together received 959 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (16 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (14 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (4 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (457 citations), Developmental Biology (77 citations), Social Psychology (570 citations), Statistics and Probability (128 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (197 citations). Daniel Hanus has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Josep Call, Michael Tomasello, Alicia P. Melis, Felix Warneken, Brian Hare, Natacha Mendes, Claudio Tennie, Juliane Bräuer, Natalie Uomini and Russell D. Gray. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of comparative psychology, Current Biology, Animal Behaviour, PLoS ONE and Biology Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact