Ben Oppenheim

1.9k citations
23 papers · 600 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ben Oppenheim

22 papers receiving 561 citations

Peers

Ben Oppenheim
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Modeling and Simulation 124
  • Infectious Diseases 119
  • Sociology and Political Science 267
  • Health 47
  • Emergency Medical Services 33
Replace Benjamin S. Morse with:
Benjamin S. Morse United States
Laurie Garrett United States
Lily L. Tsai United States
João Nunes United Kingdom
Kim Yi Dionne United States
André Peralta‐Santos Portugal
Matthew M. Kavanagh United States
Adam Kamradt‐Scott Australia
Elize Massard da Fonseca Brazil
Luisa Enria United Kingdom
Ben Oppenheim relative to Benjamin S. Morse United States Benjamin S. Morse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Benjamin S. Morse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Oppenheim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Oppenheim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Oppenheim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Oppenheim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Oppenheim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Oppenheim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Oppenheim. The network helps show where Ben Oppenheim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ben Oppenheim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ben Oppenheim Line = papers co-authored together Ben Oppenheim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019146
2 201791
3 201786
4 201573
5 201436
6 202127
7 202324
8 201624
9 201918
10 202116
11 202214
12 201910
13 20197
14 20126
15 20175
16 20224
17 20134
18 20203
19 20202
20 20211

About Ben Oppenheim

Ben Oppenheim is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Modeling and Simulation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Infectious Diseases and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 23 papers that have together received 600 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Conflict and Governance (7 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (7 papers), Zoonotic diseases and public health (5 papers), Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research (5 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (3 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (3 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (3 papers) and Peacebuilding and International Security (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (124 citations), Infectious Diseases (119 citations), Sociology and Political Science (267 citations), Health (47 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (33 citations). Ben Oppenheim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Nita Madhav, Kelly M. Greenhill, Mark Gallivan, Nathan Wolfe, Michael Weintraub, Patrick Ayscue, Enzo Nussio, Juan F. Vargas, Abbey Steele and Prime Mulembakani. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Global Health, The Journal of Development Studies, Nature Medicine, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism and Journal of Conflict Resolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact