Daniel Hack

21 papers receiving 93 citations

Peers

Daniel Hack
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 19
  • Molecular Medicine 30
  • Literature and Literary Theory 38
  • History 18
  • History and Philosophy of Science 6
Replace Angelo D’Argenzio with:
Angelo D’Argenzio Italy
Joel Vargas Italy
Alannah Tomkins United Kingdom
Kathryn R. King United States
Michael Smith United States
Supriya Bezbaruah India
Feleke Doyore Agide Iran
Tina Lu United States
Emily Beales United Kingdom
Muhammad Abrar Yousaf Pakistan
Daniel Hack relative to Angelo D’Argenzio Italy Angelo D’Argenzio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Angelo D’Argenzio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Hack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Hack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Hack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Hack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Hack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Hack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Hack. The network helps show where Daniel Hack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Hack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Hack Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Hack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202331
2 202215
3 200815
4
The Material Interests of the Victorian Novel
200513
5 20169
6 19997
7 20206
8 19966
9 20205
10 19994
11 20203
12 20203
13 20232
14 20231
15 19991
16 20201
17 20121
18 20061
19 20051
20 20201

About Daniel Hack

Daniel Hack is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Infectious Diseases, Sociology and Political Science, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 127 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infection Control and Ventilation (4 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (3 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (3 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (3 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (3 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (3 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (2 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (19 citations), Molecular Medicine (30 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (38 citations), History (18 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (6 citations). Daniel Hack has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, India and Albania. Frequent co-authors include Volkhard A. J. Kempf, Silke Besier, Michael Hogardt, Tilman Schultze, Thomas A. Wichelhaus, Claudia Reinheimer, Ulrich Rochwalsky, Sandra Ciesek, Marc Diensthuber and Timo Stöver. Their work appears in journals such as Victorian Studies, NOVEL A Forum on Fiction, Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, Clinical Microbiology and Infection and Journal of Clinical Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact