Andreas Loth

40 papers receiving 248 citations

Peers

Andreas Loth
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Sensory Systems 56
  • Otorhinolaryngology 37
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 28
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 116
  • Speech and Hearing 37
Replace A. Farinetti with:
A. Farinetti France
Paolo Malerba Italy
Joseph T. Breen United States
Abdulrahman Alsanosi Saudi Arabia
Marika Viccaro Italy
Nora M. Weiss Germany
Fida Almuhawas Saudi Arabia
Maurice Hawthorne United Kingdom
Michael J. Bauschard United States
Melville Da Cruz Australia
Andreas Loth relative to A. Farinetti France A. Farinetti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
A. Farinetti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andreas Loth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andreas Loth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andreas Loth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andreas Loth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andreas Loth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andreas Loth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andreas Loth. The network helps show where Andreas Loth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andreas Loth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andreas Loth Line = papers co-authored together Andreas Loth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202038
2 201521
3 202021
4 201913
5 202113
6 202012
7 202011
8 202210
9 202210
10 20199
11 20209
12 20236
13 20236
14 20206
15 20206
16 20216
17 20245
18 20225
19 20224
20 20194

About Andreas Loth

Andreas Loth is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Otorhinolaryngology, Oncology, Sensory Systems and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 44 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (16 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (8 papers), Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (6 papers), Infection Control and Ventilation (4 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Noise Effects and Management (4 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (56 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (37 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (28 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (116 citations) and Speech and Hearing (37 citations). Andreas Loth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Timo Stöver, Martin Leinung, Silke Helbig, Stefan Dazert, Thomas Zahnert, Jan Peter Thomas, Uwe Baumann, Sameer Gafoor, Horst Sievert and Iris Burck. Their work appears in journals such as European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Cancers, Otology & Neurotology, British Journal of Haematology and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact