Daniel H. Frank
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Religious studies top 5%
- Islamic Thought and Society Studies
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Papers in
- Philosophy 10
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 10
-
- Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies 6
- Co-authors
- Herbert A. Davidson (1 shared paper)Oliver Leaman (2 shared papers)Charles H. Manekin (1 shared paper)Menachem Kellner (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Jewish Quarterly Review (2 papers)American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly (1 paper)Journal of Law and Religion (1 paper)AJS Review The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies (1 paper)Journal of the history of philosophy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Daniel H. Frank
10 papers receiving 81 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Philosophy 92
- Religious studies 27
- Archeology 34
- Classics 5
- Political Science and International Relations 31
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel H. Frank
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel H. Frank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel H. Frank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel H. Frank more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel H. Frank
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel H. Frank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel H. Frank. The network helps show where Daniel H. Frank may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Daniel H. Frank, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1990 | 43 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 24 | |
| 3 | 1993 | 18 | |
| 4 | Anger as a Vice: A Maimonidean Critique of Aristotle's Ethics | 1990 | 11 |
| 5 | The Jewish philosophy reader | 2000 | 9 |
| 6 | 1992 | 7 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 10 | Autonomy and Judaism | 1992 | 2 |
| 11 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 0 | |
| 14 | On Liberty: Jewish Philosophical Perspectives | 1999 | 0 |
| 15 | 1998 | 0 |
About Daniel H. Frank
Daniel H. Frank is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Religious studies, Political Science and International Relations and Demography, having authored 15 papers that have together received 129 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval and Classical Philosophy (10 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (6 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (5 papers), Jewish Identity and Society (3 papers), Islamic Studies and History (2 papers), Islamic Thought and Society Studies (1 paper), Political Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper) and Religious Freedom and Discrimination (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (92 citations), Religious studies (27 citations), Archeology (34 citations), Classics (5 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (31 citations). Daniel H. Frank has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Herbert A. Davidson, Oliver Leaman, Charles H. Manekin and Menachem Kellner. Their work appears in journals such as The Jewish Quarterly Review, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, Journal of Law and Religion, AJS Review The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies and Journal of the history of philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.