Daniel Friedman

15.1k citations
221 papers · 9.2k indexed · 5 hit papers · h-index 45

Daniel Friedman

209 papers receiving 9.0k citations

Hit Papers

Measurements and models of...3891998202620072016250500750

Peers

Daniel Friedman
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 3.2k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.9k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 3.0k
  • Neurology 1.3k
  • Neurology 1.4k
Replace Jerzy P. Szaflarski with:
Jerzy P. Szaflarski United States
Jun Wada Japan
Steven C. Schachter United States
Geraldo F. Busatto Brazil
James W. Wheless United States
Masatoshi Takeda Japan
Martin Schmelz Germany
Felix Rosenow Germany
Sameer M. Zuberi United Kingdom
Martha J. Morrell United States
Daniel Friedman relative to Jerzy P. Szaflarski United States Jerzy P. Szaflarski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Jerzy P. Szaflarski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Friedman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Friedman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Friedman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Friedman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Friedman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Friedman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Friedman. The network helps show where Daniel Friedman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Friedman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Friedman Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Friedman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20251
3 20251
4 20245
5 20242
6 20243
7 20237
8 202230
9 20225
10 202136
11 202128
12 202133
13 202011
14 201912
15 201938
16 201935
17 20191
18 201847
19 2017134
20
Measurements and models of electric fields in the in vivo human brain during transcranial electric stimulationbreakdown →
2017389

About Daniel Friedman

Daniel Friedman is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 221 papers that have together received 9.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (112 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (50 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (44 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (43 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (25 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (20 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (18 papers) and Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (3.2k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.9k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (3.0k citations). Daniel Friedman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Orrin Devinsky, John P. Donoghue, Jacqueline A. French, Mengia S. Rioult-Pedotti, Grzegorz Hess, Werner Doyle, Patricia Dugan, Marsha Wood, Paul Andersen and Karl R. Beutner. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsia, Epilepsy & Behavior, Neurology, The Lancet Neurology and Epilepsia Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026