Ruth Faden
- General Health Professions top 0.1%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 0.2%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Health top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Nancy KassAndrea C. GielenMadison PowersPatricia O’CampoAnne Drapkin LyerlyJeremy SugarmanTom L. BeauchampGail Geller
- Topics
- Ethics in medical practice (41 papers)Ethics in Clinical Research (36 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (23 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Ruth Faden
223 papers receiving 8.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 179
- General Health Professions 3.6k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 3.4k
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1.4k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.1k
- Health 1.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Faden
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Faden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Faden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Faden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Faden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Faden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Faden. The network helps show where Ruth Faden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Faden
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Faden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Faden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Faden. Ruth Faden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | Biotechnology, Justice and Health | 1 |
| 12 | Workshop and commissioned papers | 2 |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 90 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 129 | |
| 18 | Almost) everything you ever wanted to know about informed consent. | 1 |
| 19 | 40 | |
| 20 | Contemporary breast-feeding patterns: Focus on disadvantaged women | 7 |
About Ruth Faden
Ruth Faden is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 235 papers that have together received 8.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (41 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (36 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (3.6k citations), Health (1.1k citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (3.4k citations). Ruth Faden has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Nancy Kass, Andrea C. Gielen, Madison Powers, Patricia O’Campo, Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Jeremy Sugarman, Tom L. Beauchamp, Gail Geller, Neil A. Holtzman and Margaret Olivia Little. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and New England Journal of Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.