Daniel Chen

10 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniel Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Family Practice 177
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 686
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 591
  • General Health Professions 334
  • Health Information Management 59
Replace Kristine Olson with:
Kristine Olson United States
Thomas M. Miller United States
R. J. Ancill Canada
Anna Ratzliff United States
Guoxing Zhu China
Patrick Sullivan United States
Daniel Guinart United States
Michaël Saraga Switzerland
Stephen Schultz United States
Katsuhiko Hagi Japan
Daniel Chen relative to Kristine Olson United States Kristine Olson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18.1×
Kristine Olson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Chen. The network helps show where Daniel Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Chen Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2007413
2 1997391
3 2012207
4 200970
5 201627
6 202213
7 199011
8 20205
9 20232
10 20162
11 20250
12 20250

About Daniel Chen

Daniel Chen is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice, Psychiatry and Mental health, Artificial Intelligence and Molecular Biology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (4 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), COVID-19 diagnosis using AI (1 paper), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (1 paper) and Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (177 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (686 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (591 citations), General Health Professions (334 citations) and Health Information Management (59 citations). Daniel Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jay D. Orlander, Warren Hershman, Robert Lew, Peter S. Klein, Virginia M.‐Y. Lee, Ming Hong, Jun Yan, Robert H. Aseltine, Ziming Xuan and Raymond M. Quock. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of General Internal Medicine, Pharmacological Research, The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact