Daniel C. Smith
Impact in
- Marketing top 2%
- Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
- Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
-
- Wine Industry and Tourism
Papers in
-
- Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification 2
- Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior 2
- Health 1
- Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights 1
- Co-authors
- Peter A. Dacin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Marketing Research (2 papers)Journal of Marketing (1 paper)Cogent Food & Agriculture (1 paper)NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) (1 paper)Time to knit (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Daniel C. Smith
6 papers receiving 348 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Marketing 318
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 24
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 124
- Information Systems and Management 31
- Sociology and Political Science 173
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Smith. The network helps show where Daniel C. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Daniel C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1992 | 221 | |
| 2 | 1994 | 149 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 13 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 6 | Hubble Space Telescope Reduced-Gyro Control Law Design, Implementation, and On-Orbit Performance | 2008 | 1 |
About Daniel C. Smith
Daniel C. Smith is a scholar working on Marketing, Health, General Health Professions, Information Systems and Management and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 6 papers that have together received 389 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (2 papers), Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior (2 papers), Diverse Topics in Contemporary Research (1 paper), Spacecraft Dynamics and Control (1 paper), Ethics in Business and Education (1 paper), Management and Marketing Education (1 paper), Mercury impact and mitigation studies (1 paper) and Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (318 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (24 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (124 citations), Information Systems and Management (31 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (173 citations). Daniel C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter A. Dacin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Marketing, Cogent Food & Agriculture, NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) and Time to knit.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.