Daniel C. Murrie

4.3k total citations
93 papers, 2.8k citations indexed

About

Daniel C. Murrie is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel C. Murrie has authored 93 papers receiving a total of 2.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 70 papers in Clinical Psychology, 51 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 20 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Daniel C. Murrie's work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (67 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (32 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (26 papers). Daniel C. Murrie is often cited by papers focused on Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (67 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (32 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (26 papers). Daniel C. Murrie collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Daniel C. Murrie's co-authors include Marcus T. Boccaccini, Dewey G. Cornell, Katrina A. Rufino, Janet I. Warren, Darrel B. Turner, Lucy A. Guarnera, Samuel W. Hawes, Park Elliott Dietz, Itiel E. Dror and W. Neil Gowensmith and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Science, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Psychological Assessment.

In The Last Decade

Daniel C. Murrie

89 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel C. Murrie United States 33 2.4k 1.5k 630 281 170 93 2.8k
Ronald Roesch Canada 26 1.6k 0.7× 699 0.5× 596 0.9× 113 0.4× 257 1.5× 110 2.2k
Randy K. Otto United States 23 1.3k 0.5× 704 0.5× 345 0.5× 70 0.2× 107 0.6× 65 1.8k
Daniel W. Shuman United States 20 1.0k 0.4× 374 0.3× 533 0.8× 195 0.7× 55 0.3× 70 1.5k
Patricia A. Zapf United States 22 952 0.4× 349 0.2× 444 0.7× 114 0.4× 170 1.0× 73 1.4k
Catherine A. Cormier Canada 13 2.6k 1.1× 2.1k 1.4× 219 0.3× 81 0.3× 124 0.7× 13 3.0k
Jodi L. Viljoen Canada 24 1.4k 0.6× 975 0.7× 383 0.6× 107 0.4× 57 0.3× 82 1.9k
David DeMatteo United States 23 1.1k 0.5× 805 0.6× 264 0.4× 79 0.3× 84 0.5× 101 1.6k
Christine Michie United Kingdom 20 3.1k 1.3× 2.1k 1.4× 421 0.7× 87 0.3× 137 0.8× 34 3.3k
Stephen C. P. Wong Canada 30 3.7k 1.6× 2.8k 1.9× 332 0.5× 155 0.6× 166 1.0× 77 4.0k
Laura S. Guy United States 24 1.7k 0.7× 1.1k 0.7× 262 0.4× 72 0.3× 204 1.2× 51 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Murrie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Murrie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Murrie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Murrie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Murrie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Murrie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Murrie. The network helps show where Daniel C. Murrie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel C. Murrie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel C. Murrie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel C. Murrie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel C. Murrie. Daniel C. Murrie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Guarnera, Lucy A., Daniel C. Murrie, Brett O. Gardner, & Scott D. Bender. (2024). Are forensic evaluators more likely to conclude that Black or White defendants are malingering?. Law and Human Behavior. 48(5-6). 545–563.
2.
Murrie, Daniel C., et al.. (2023). Evaluations of competence to stand trial are evolving amid a national “competency crisis”. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 41(5). 310–325. 1 indexed citations
3.
Helmus, L. Maaike, et al.. (2021). Field validity of Static-99R and STABLE-2007 with 4,433 men serving sentences for sexual offences in British Columbia: New findings and meta-analysis.. Psychological Assessment. 33(7). 581–595. 24 indexed citations
4.
Murrie, Daniel C., et al.. (2020). Competency to stand trial evaluations: A state‐wide review of court‐ordered reports. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 38(1). 32–50. 4 indexed citations
5.
6.
Gardner, Brett O., et al.. (2019). Do evidence submission forms expose latent print examiners to task-irrelevant information?. Forensic Science International. 297. 236–242. 15 indexed citations
7.
Murrie, Daniel C., Brett O. Gardner, Sharon M. Kelley, & Itiel E. Dror. (2019). Perceptions and estimates of error rates in forensic science: A survey of forensic analysts. Forensic Science International. 302. 109887–109887. 30 indexed citations
8.
Gardner, Brett O., Marcus T. Boccaccini, & Daniel C. Murrie. (2018). Which PCL-R Scores Best Predict Forensic Clinicians’ Opinions of Offender Risk?. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 45(9). 1404–1419. 1 indexed citations
9.
Dror, Itiel E. & Daniel C. Murrie. (2017). A hierarchy of expert performance applied to forensic psychological assessments.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 24(1). 11–23. 43 indexed citations
10.
Boccaccini, Marcus T., et al.. (2017). Field validity of Static-99/R scores in a statewide sample of 34,687 convicted sexual offenders.. Psychological Assessment. 29(6). 611–623. 21 indexed citations
11.
Turner, Darrel B., et al.. (2015). Jurors Report that Risk Measure Scores Matter in Sexually Violent Predator Trials, but that Other Factors Matter More. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 33(1). 56–73. 13 indexed citations
12.
Pisani, Anthony R., Daniel C. Murrie, & Morton M. Silverman. (2015). Reformulating Suicide Risk Formulation: From Prediction to Prevention. Academic Psychiatry. 40(4). 623–629. 88 indexed citations
13.
Boccaccini, Marcus T., et al.. (2015). Psychopathy Checklist–Revised Use and Reporting Practices in Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations. Sexual Abuse. 29(6). 592–614. 19 indexed citations
14.
Boccaccini, Marcus T., et al.. (2013). Same score, different message: Perceptions of offender risk depend on Static-99R risk communication format.. Law and Human Behavior. 38(5). 418–427. 27 indexed citations
15.
Boccaccini, Marcus T., et al.. (2010). Predicting recidivism with the Personality Assessment Inventory in a sample of sex offenders screened for civil commitment as sexually violent predators.. Psychological Assessment. 22(1). 142–148. 42 indexed citations
16.
Redding, Richard E. & Daniel C. Murrie. (2007). Judicial decision making about forensic mental health evidence.. SSRN Electronic Journal. 12 indexed citations
17.
Murrie, Daniel C.. (2006). Opinion formation in evaluation of competence to stand trial: Results from 8,146 evaluations.. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 24. 1 indexed citations
18.
Murrie, Daniel C., et al.. (2004). Psychopathy scores and violence among juvenile offenders: a multi‐measure study. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 22(1). 49–67. 111 indexed citations
19.
Warren, Janet I., Daniel C. Murrie, Preeti Chauhan, Park Elliott Dietz, & James Morris. (2003). Opinion formation in evaluating sanity at the time of the offense: an examination of 5175 pre‐trial evaluations. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 22(2). 171–186. 47 indexed citations
20.
Murrie, Daniel C., Janet I. Warren, Marianne Kristiansson, & Park Elliott Dietz. (2002). Asperger's Syndrome in Forensic Settings. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 1(1). 59–70. 129 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ronald Roesch Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Randy K. Otto Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daniel W. Shuman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Patricia A. Zapf Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Catherine A. Cormier Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jodi L. Viljoen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David DeMatteo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christine Michie Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stephen C. P. Wong Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Laura S. Guy
Rankless by CCL
2026