Moti Mizrahi
- Philosophy top 1%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Wesley BuckwalterDavid R. Morrow
- Topics
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (41 papers)Philosophy and History of Science (33 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaRussia
In The Last Decade
Moti Mizrahi
69 papers receiving 465 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Philosophy 300
- History and Philosophy of Science 263
- Cognitive Neuroscience 155
- Global and Planetary Change 75
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 68
Countries citing papers authored by Moti Mizrahi
This map shows the geographic impact of Moti Mizrahi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Moti Mizrahi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Moti Mizrahi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Moti Mizrahi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Moti Mizrahi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Moti Mizrahi. The network helps show where Moti Mizrahi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Moti Mizrahi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Moti Mizrahi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Moti Mizrahi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Moti Mizrahi. Moti Mizrahi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | The Scientism Debate: A Battle for the Soul of Philosophy? | 0 |
| 6 | The (Lack of) Evidence for the Kuhnian Image of Science | 1 |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | On appeals to intuition: a reply to Muñoz-Suárez | 2 |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | Essentialism: Metaphysical or Psychological? | 2 |
| 16 | Against Phenomenal Conservatism: a Reply to Moretti | 2 |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | A Decision Procedure for Evaluating Natural Language Arguments | 1 |
| 20 | ‘Ought’ Does Not Imply ‘Can’ | 14 |
About Moti Mizrahi
Moti Mizrahi is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 78 papers that have together received 531 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (41 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (33 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (263 citations), Philosophy (300 citations) and Family Practice (19 citations). Moti Mizrahi has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Wesley Buckwalter and David R. Morrow. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Philosophical Studies and The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.