Daniel A. Devcich
Impact in
- Family Practice top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 10%
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills 2
-
- Patient Safety and Medication Errors 4
- Co-authors
- Keith J. Petrie (5 shared papers)Christopher J. Ellis (3 shared papers)Elizabeth Broadbent (2 shared papers)Greg Gamble (2 shared papers)Alan Merry (5 shared papers)Simon J Mitchell (3 shared papers)Christine M. Rubie‐Davies (1 shared paper)Jacqueline A. Hannam (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMJ Quality & Safety (2 papers)Appetite (1 paper)Health Psychology (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)Journal of Psychosomatic Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Daniel A. Devcich
13 papers receiving 711 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
- Family Practice 26
- Applied Psychology 43
- Emergency Medical Services 54
- Pharmacy 37
- Psychiatry and Mental health 100
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel A. Devcich
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel A. Devcich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel A. Devcich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel A. Devcich more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel A. Devcich
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel A. Devcich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel A. Devcich. The network helps show where Daniel A. Devcich may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Daniel A. Devcich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 339 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 159 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 75 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 13 | Is refractory angina pectoris a form of chronic pain? A comparison of two patient groups receiving spinal cord stimulation therapy. | 2014 | 1 |
About Daniel A. Devcich
Daniel A. Devcich is a scholar working on Family Practice, Emergency Medical Services, Pharmacy, Emergency Medicine and Health Information Management, having authored 13 papers that have together received 749 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (3 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers) and Radiology practices and education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (26 citations), Applied Psychology (43 citations), Emergency Medical Services (54 citations), Pharmacy (37 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (100 citations). Daniel A. Devcich has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Keith J. Petrie, Christopher J. Ellis, Elizabeth Broadbent, Greg Gamble, Alan Merry, Simon J Mitchell, Christine M. Rubie‐Davies, Jacqueline A. Hannam, David Cumin and Jennifer Weller. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Quality & Safety, Appetite, Health Psychology, BMJ Open and Journal of Psychosomatic Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.