Dana Hamplová

1.0k citations
45 papers · 681 · h-index 15

Impact in

    • Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
    • Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
  • Demography top 2%
    • Family Dynamics and Relationships

Papers in

Dana Hamplová

45 papers receiving 631 citations

Peers

Dana Hamplová
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Gender Studies 242
  • Demography 260
  • Health 77
  • Sociology and Political Science 383
  • Safety Research 46
Replace Chin-Chun Yi with:
Chin-Chun Yi Taiwan
Timo Anttila Finland
Rosemary Gillespie United Kingdom
Leslie Collins United States
Yuying Tong Hong Kong
John P. Marcum United States
Emilia Del Bono United Kingdom
Jennifer Reid Keene United States
Charlene E. Depner United States
Jaerim Lee South Korea
Dana Hamplová relative to Chin-Chun Yi Taiwan Chin-Chun Yi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Chin-Chun Yi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dana Hamplová

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Hamplová's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Hamplová with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Hamplová more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Hamplová

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Hamplová. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Hamplová. The network helps show where Dana Hamplová may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Dana Hamplová, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dana Hamplová Line = papers co-authored together Dana Hamplová links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201391
2 200873
3 200953
4 200947
5 201443
6 202033
7 202232
8 200832
9 201625
10 201818
11 200217
12 202317
13 200817
14 200616
15 201915
16 201414
17 202114
18 201814
19 201312
20 201910

About Dana Hamplová

Dana Hamplová is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Gender Studies, Health and General Health Professions, having authored 45 papers that have together received 681 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Dynamics and Relationships (14 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (13 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (7 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (7 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (5 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (5 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (5 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (242 citations), Demography (260 citations), Health (77 citations), Sociology and Political Science (383 citations) and Safety Research (46 citations). Dana Hamplová has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Céline Le Bourdais, Shelley Clark, Kryštof Zeman, Tomáš Sobotka, Vladimíra Kantorová, Évelyne Lapierre‐Adamcyk, Tomáš Mráček, Martin Sládek, Alena Sumová and Mariona Lozano. Their work appears in journals such as Demographic Research, Journal of Family Issues, Canadian Studies in Population, Scientific Reports and Social Science Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact