David Rempel

190 papers receiving 6.7k citations

Peers

David Rempel
Comparison fields: 5 of 178
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 1.1k
  • Pharmacology 2.8k
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 1.1k
  • Social Psychology 2.4k
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 423
Replace Thomas J. Armstrong with:
Thomas J. Armstrong United States
Pascal Madeleine Denmark
Jack T. Dennerlein United States
Barbara Silverstein United States
Arun Garg United States
Gisela Sjøgaard Denmark
Don B. Chaffin United States
Bryan Buchholz United States
Karen Søgaard Denmark
Maury A. Nussbaum United States
David Rempel relative to Thomas J. Armstrong United States Thomas J. Armstrong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Thomas J. Armstrong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Rempel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Rempel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Rempel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Rempel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Rempel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Rempel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Rempel. The network helps show where David Rempel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Rempel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Rempel Line = papers co-authored together David Rempel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 198 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998434
2 1996350
3 1992271
4 2015247
5 2013236
6 1994221
7 2006164
8
Risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders among computer users.
1999157
9 1995137
10 1999127
11 2019127
12 1997125
13 2003125
14 2014122
15 2002102
16 200596
17 200688
18 199886
19 199784
20 201384

About David Rempel

David Rempel is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Social Psychology, Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 198 papers that have together received 7.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (85 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (70 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (41 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (27 papers), Effects of Vibration on Health (27 papers), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (24 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (24 papers) and Occupational health in dentistry (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (1.1k citations), Pharmacology (2.8k citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (1.1k citations), Social Psychology (2.4k citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (423 citations). David Rempel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Keir, Joel M. Bach, Julia Faucett, Edward Diao, Alan Barr, Andrew J. Wyrobek, Carisa Harris‐Adamson, Bradley Evanoff, Jack T. Dennerlein and Stephen Burastero. Their work appears in journals such as Ergonomics, Journal of Orthopaedic Research®, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Occupational and Environmental Medicine and Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact