Dan Miller

446 citations
16 papers · 328 indexed · h-index 9

Dan Miller

15 papers receiving 303 citations

Peers

Dan Miller
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 88
  • Insect Science 90
  • Ecology 161
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 103
  • Infectious Diseases 45
Replace Stephen M. Spomer with:
Stephen M. Spomer United States
Robert W. Heckman United States
Lucy M. Rogers United Kingdom
Eiji Kanda Japan
Kirk Barnett Australia
Richard J. Rowe Australia
Mario A. Carvajal Chile
Tonia Korves United States
H. van Hamburg South Africa
Edvard Glücksman United Kingdom
Dan Miller relative to Stephen M. Spomer United States Stephen M. Spomer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Stephen M. Spomer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Miller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Miller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Miller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Miller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Miller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Miller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Miller. The network helps show where Dan Miller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Miller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Miller Line = papers co-authored together Dan Miller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 20220
2 202035
3 20174
4 20175
5 20165
6 201612
7 201539
8 20145
9
Volcanic-ash-derived forest soils of the inland Northwest: Properties and implications for management and restoration
200722
10 200523
11 200521
12 200591
13 200227
14
Return of the giants: restoring white pine ecosystems by breeding and aggressive planting of blister rust-resistant white pines.
20018
15
Assessment of Forest Insect Conditions at Opax Mountain Silviculture Trail
19982
16 195729

About Dan Miller

Dan Miller is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Agronomy and Crop Science and Oceanography, having authored 16 papers that have together received 328 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (5 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (5 papers), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (4 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (3 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (3 papers), Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (2 papers) and Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (88 citations), Insect Science (90 citations), Ecology (161 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (103 citations) and Infectious Diseases (45 citations). Dan Miller has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Israel. Frequent co-authors include C. Wayne Berisford, Christopher Asaro, C. E. French, J M Edwards, Donal O’Toole, L. F. Woodard, Jacqueline L. Cavender, Todd E. Cornish, Christopher M. Crowe and Peter Mayo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Entomology, Marine Genomics, Scientific Reports, FEMS Microbiology Ecology and Journal of Wildlife Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026