Dan Hough

1.1k citations
43 papers · 597 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Hough

40 papers receiving 526 citations

Peers

Dan Hough
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Political Science and International Relations 490
  • Strategy and Management 94
  • Public Administration 18
  • Sociology and Political Science 197
  • Communication 29
Replace Luciano Bardi with:
Luciano Bardi Italy
Zdenka Mansfeldová Czechia
Nathalie Brack Belgium
Olivier Costa France
Abby Innes United Kingdom
Myrto Tsakatika United Kingdom
Fernando Casal Bértoa United Kingdom
Giacomo Benedetto United Kingdom
Reinhard Heinisch Austria
Wilhelm Bürklin Germany
Dan Hough relative to Luciano Bardi Italy Luciano Bardi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Luciano Bardi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Hough

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Hough's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Hough with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Hough more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Hough

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Hough. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Hough. The network helps show where Dan Hough may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Dan Hough, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Hough Line = papers co-authored together Dan Hough links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Devolution and electoral politics
2006167
2 200361
3 201342
4 200740
5 200936
6 201029
7 200924
8 200820
9
The fall and rise of the PDS in eastern Germany
200119
10 201518
11 200515
12
Landtagswahlen: Bundestestwahlen oder Regionalwahlen?
200315
13 200912
14 201011
15 200910
16 20039
17 20048
18 20118
19 20068
20 20115

About Dan Hough

Dan Hough is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management, Public Administration and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European Union Policy and Governance (9 papers), Political Systems and Governance (8 papers), Public Administration and Political Analysis (8 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (6 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (5 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (4 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (3 papers) and German legal, social, and political studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (490 citations), Strategy and Management (94 citations), Public Administration (18 citations), Sociology and Political Science (197 citations) and Communication (29 citations). Dan Hough has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Charlie Jeffery, Michael Koß, Jonathan Olsen, Christina Boswell, Tània Verge, Eve Hepburn, Charles Lees, Dan Keith, Kai Oppermann and Justin Fisher. Their work appears in journals such as Representation, German Politics, German Politics & Society, The Political Quarterly and Regional & Federal Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact